2009Zeitschrift für GastroenterologieRequires access

Value of anorectal manometry in patients with impaired defecation

András Király, L Nagy, C Weninger, Anita Illés

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Several guidelines recommend anorectal manometry in patients with functional anorectal disorders, eg. fecal incontinence and chronic constipation caused by outlet obstruction. We retrospectively reviewed tracings obtained between March 2005 and November 2008. A total of 189 patients (80% women; average age 56 years) were included. The main indications were fecal incontinence (21%) and constipation (79%). Patients suffering from incontinence were older (68±6 vs. 52±8 years) and had lower resting (35±8mmHg vs. 63±5mmHg P≤0.01) and squeeze pressure (54±7mmHg vs. 112±9mmHg P≤0.01) compared to continent patients, the perceptual thresholds were significantly lower in patients with fecal incontinence (urge: 50±4ml), compaired to those with constipation (137±18ml, P≤0.001). However, the sensitivity and specificity of manometric data seems to be low. An abnormal straining pattern suggesting dyssynergic defecation was seen in 51% of constipated patients compared to 85% of patients with fecal incontinence. Because of the low sensitivity and specificity of manometric parameters endoanal ultrasonography, defecography, balloon expulsion test are suggested to be performed in all patients with defecation disorders in order to make accurate diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Several guidelines recommend anorectal manometry in patients with functional anorectal disorders, eg. fecal incontinence and chronic constipation caused by outlet obstruction. We retrospectively reviewed tracings obtained between March 2005 and November 2008. A total of 189 patients (80% women; average age 56 years) were included. The main indications were fecal incontinence (21%) and constipation (79%). Patients suffering from incontinence were older (68±6 vs. 52±8 years) and had lower resting (35±8mmHg vs. 63±5mmHg P≤0.01) and squeeze pressure (54±7mmHg vs. 112±9mmHg P≤0.01) compared to continent patients, the perceptual thresholds were significantly lower in patients with fecal incontinence (urge: 50±4ml), compaired to those with constipation (137±18ml, P≤0.001). However, the sensitivity and specificity of manometric data seems to be low. An abnormal straining pattern suggesting dyssynergic defecation was seen in 51% of constipated patients compared to 85% of patients with fecal incontinence. Because of the low sensitivity and specificity of manometric parameters endoanal ultrasonography, defecography, balloon expulsion test are suggested to be performed in all patients with defecation disorders in order to make accurate diagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Several guidelines recommend anorectal manometry in patients with functional anorectal disorders, eg. fecal incontinence and chronic constipation caused by outlet obstruction. We retrospectively reviewed tracings obtained between March 2005 and November 2008. A total of 189 patients (80% women; average age 56 years) were included. The main indications were fecal incontinence (21%) and constipation (79%). Patients suffering from incontinence were older (68±6 vs. 52±8 years) and had lower resting (35±8mmHg vs. 63±5mmHg P≤0.01) and squeeze pressure (54±7mmHg vs. 112±9mmHg P≤0.01) compared to continent patients, the perceptual thresholds were significantly lower in patients with fecal incontinence (urge: 50±4ml), compaired to those with constipation (137±18ml, P≤0.001). However, the sensitivity and specificity of manometric data seems to be low. An abnormal straining pattern suggesting dyssynergic defecation was seen in 51% of constipated patients compared to 85% of patients with fecal incontinence. Because of the low sensitivity and specificity of manometric parameters endoanal ultrasonography, defecography, balloon expulsion test are suggested to be performed in all patients with defecation disorders in order to make accurate diagnosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Defecography, Anorectal manometry, Constipation, Fecal incontinence, Defecation, Obstructed defecation, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Value of anorectal manometry in patients with impaired defecation — Research Paper | ScholarLens