1993Rinsho yakuri/Japanese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and TherapeuticsOpen access

Electrophysiological Effects of a Single Oral Administration of Pentisomide (ME3202) in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia.

Tadashi Yasui, Hitoshi Chikamatsu, Atsushi Kani, Manji Noba, Kazuo Kato, Yoshiaki Ishiguro, Takeshi Shimaji, Hiroyuki Matsuyama, Hitoshi Hishida, Yasushi Mizuno

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The cardiac electrophysiological effects of pentisomide, a new class I antiarrhythmicagent, were studied in 14 patients with sunraventricular tachycardia.Pentisomide did not significantly change sinus cycle length, PA time, and AH and HVintervals at 1.5 hr after a single oral administration of 300, 400 or 600 mg. Furthermore, theantegrade and retrograde refractory periods of AV node and the accessory pathway were notsignificantly changed. However induction of supraventricular tachycardia was suppressed in 5out of 14 patients. Three of the 5 patients showed AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 1 intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) and 1 concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Pentisomide blocked the retrograde conduction in AV node in 3 patients with.AVNRT. The retrograde conduction in the accessory pathway was blocked in the patientwith concealed WPW syndrome. The plasma concentration of pentisomide at 1.5 hr afteradministration was 3.0±1.5 μg/ml in the effective cases and 2 .3±1.5 μg/ml in ineffectivecases (no statistically significance).Conclusion: A single oral administration of pentisomide showed no statistically significantinfluence on the electrophysiological parameters of human hearts, whereas it was effective insuppression of supraventricular tachycardia by the mechanism of retrograde conduction blockin several patients.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The cardiac electrophysiological effects of pentisomide, a new class I antiarrhythmicagent, were studied in 14 patients with sunraventricular tachycardia.Pentisomide did not significantly change sinus cycle length, PA time, and AH and HVintervals at 1.5 hr after a single oral administration of 300, 400 or 600 mg. Furthermore, theantegrade and retrograde refractory periods of AV node and the accessory pathway were notsignificantly changed. However induction of supraventricular tachycardia was suppressed in 5out of 14 patients. Three of the 5 patients showed AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 1 intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) and 1 concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Pentisomide blocked the retrograde conduction in AV node in 3 patients with.AVNRT. The retrograde conduction in the accessory pathway was blocked in the patientwith concealed WPW syndrome. The plasma concentration of pentisomide at 1.5 hr afteradministration was 3.0±1.5 μg/ml in the effective cases and 2 .3±1.5 μg/ml in ineffectivecases (no statistically significance).Conclusion: A single oral administration of pentisomide showed no statistically significantinfluence on the electrophysiological parameters of human hearts, whereas it was effective insuppression of supraventricular tachycardia by the mechanism of retrograde conduction blockin several patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The cardiac electrophysiological effects of pentisomide, a new class I antiarrhythmicagent, were studied in 14 patients with sunraventricular tachycardia.Pentisomide did not significantly change sinus cycle length, PA time, and AH and HVintervals at 1.5 hr after a single oral administration of 300, 400 or 600 mg. Furthermore, theantegrade and retrograde refractory periods of AV node and the accessory pathway were notsignificantly changed. However induction of supraventricular tachycardia was suppressed in 5out of 14 patients. Three of the 5 patients showed AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 1 intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) and 1 concealed Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome. Pentisomide blocked the retrograde conduction in AV node in 3 patients with.AVNRT. The retrograde conduction in the accessory pathway was blocked in the patientwith concealed WPW syndrome. The plasma concentration of pentisomide at 1.5 hr afteradministration was 3.0±1.5 μg/ml in the effective cases and 2 .3±1.5 μg/ml in ineffectivecases (no statistically significance).Conclusion: A single oral administration of pentisomide showed no statistically significantinfluence on the electrophysiological parameters of human hearts, whereas it was effective insuppression of supraventricular tachycardia by the mechanism of retrograde conduction blockin several patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Supraventricular tachycardia, Accessory pathway, Tachycardia, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Effective refractory period, Electrophysiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electrophysiological Effects of a Single Oral Administration of Pentisomide (ME3202) in Patients with Supraventricular Tachycardia. — Research Paper | ScholarLens