2014•Zeitschrift für GastroenterologieRequires access

Impact of rifaximin on the frequency and characteristics of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites

Philipp Ludwig Lutz, Marijo Parčina, Isabelle Bekeredjian‐Ding, Kenneth M. Pfarr, Hans Dieter Nischalke, Jacob Nattermann, Tilman Sauerbruch, Achim M. Hoerauf, CP Straßburg, Ulrich Spengler

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Rifaximin is a non-absorbable antibiotic used to prevent relapses of hepatic encephalopathy which may also be a candidate for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Aim: To detect the impact of rifaximin on the occurrence and characteristics of SBP. Methods: We prospectively studied all patients that underwent a diagnostic paracentesis in our department from March 2012 to April 2013 for SBP and recorded all clinical data including type of SBP prophylaxis, prior use of rifaximin, concomitant complications of cirrhosis, as well as laboratory results and bacteriological findings. Patients were divided into the following three groups: no antibiotic prophylaxis, prophylaxis with rifaximin or systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Results: Our study cohort comprised 152 patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, 32 of whom developed SBP during the study period. As expected, our study groups differed regarding a history of hepatic encephalopathy and SBP before inclusion into the study. None of the 17 patients on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis developed SBP while 8/27 patients on rifaximin and 24/108 without prophylaxis had SBP (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 versus systemic antibiotics, respectively). In general, episodes of SBP were similar for patients treated with rifaximin and those without any prophylaxis. However, Escherichia coli and enterococci were dominant in the ascites of patients without any prophylaxis, while mostly klebsiella species were recovered from the ascites samples in the rifaximin group. Conclusion: Rifaximin pretreatment changes the bacterial source of SBP, which was less frequent in patients with systemic antibiotic prophylaxis than in patients on rifaximin. Testing rifaximin resistance in the identified bacteria may clarify why infections occur during treatment with rifaximin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Rifaximin is a non-absorbable antibiotic used to prevent relapses of hepatic encephalopathy which may also be a candidate for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Aim: To detect the impact of rifaximin on the occurrence and characteristics of SBP. Methods: We prospectively studied all patients that underwent a diagnostic paracentesis in our department from March 2012 to April 2013 for SBP and recorded all clinical data including type of SBP prophylaxis, prior use of rifaximin, concomitant complications of cirrhosis, as well as laboratory results and bacteriological findings. Patients were divided into the following three groups: no antibiotic prophylaxis, prophylaxis with rifaximin or systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Results: Our study cohort comprised 152 patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, 32 of whom developed SBP during the study period. As expected, our study groups differed regarding a history of hepatic encephalopathy and SBP before inclusion into the study. None of the 17 patients on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis developed SBP while 8/27 patients on rifaximin and 24/108 without prophylaxis had SBP (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 versus systemic antibiotics, respectively). In general, episodes of SBP were similar for patients treated with rifaximin and those without any prophylaxis. However, Escherichia coli and enterococci were dominant in the ascites of patients without any prophylaxis, while mostly klebsiella species were recovered from the ascites samples in the rifaximin group. Conclusion: Rifaximin pretreatment changes the bacterial source of SBP, which was less frequent in patients with systemic antibiotic prophylaxis than in patients on rifaximin. Testing rifaximin resistance in the identified bacteria may clarify why infections occur during treatment with rifaximin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Rifaximin is a non-absorbable antibiotic used to prevent relapses of hepatic encephalopathy which may also be a candidate for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). Aim: To detect the impact of rifaximin on the occurrence and characteristics of SBP. Methods: We prospectively studied all patients that underwent a diagnostic paracentesis in our department from March 2012 to April 2013 for SBP and recorded all clinical data including type of SBP prophylaxis, prior use of rifaximin, concomitant complications of cirrhosis, as well as laboratory results and bacteriological findings. Patients were divided into the following three groups: no antibiotic prophylaxis, prophylaxis with rifaximin or systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. Results: Our study cohort comprised 152 patients with advanced liver cirrhosis, 32 of whom developed SBP during the study period. As expected, our study groups differed regarding a history of hepatic encephalopathy and SBP before inclusion into the study. None of the 17 patients on systemic antibiotic prophylaxis developed SBP while 8/27 patients on rifaximin and 24/108 without prophylaxis had SBP (p = 0.02 and p = 0.04 versus systemic antibiotics, respectively). In general, episodes of SBP were similar for patients treated with rifaximin and those without any prophylaxis. However, Escherichia coli and enterococci were dominant in the ascites of patients without any prophylaxis, while mostly klebsiella species were recovered from the ascites samples in the rifaximin group. Conclusion: Rifaximin pretreatment changes the bacterial source of SBP, which was less frequent in patients with systemic antibiotic prophylaxis than in patients on rifaximin. Testing rifaximin resistance in the identified bacteria may clarify why infections occur during treatment with rifaximin.

Key concepts: Rifaximin, Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, Ascites, Cirrhosis, Medicine, Hepatic encephalopathy, Gastroenterology, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Impact of rifaximin on the frequency and characteristics of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites — Research Paper | ScholarLens