Prophylactic Efficacy of Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystals and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Urinary Infections
Thomas A. Stamey, Mercy Condy, Gladys Mihara
Abstract
Thomas A. Stamey, Mercy Condy, Gladys Mihara
Abstract
We examined bacterial persistence and resistance in the vaginal and fecal flora of 28 women who received a total of 253 months of daily low-dosage prophylaxis with nitrofurantoin macrocystals (100 mg per day) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (40 and 200 mg respectively). During trimethoprim-sulfamehtoxazole prophylaxis, 8.5% of monthly vaginal and 27% of monthly fecal cultures grew Escherichia coli, as compared to 36 and 96%, respectively for nitrofurantoin macrocrystals. Esch. coli resistant to nitrofurantoin occurred in two of 95 fecal cultures during therapy, and Esch. coli resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in 16 of 182 (8.8%) fecal cultures. In the 12 months before treatment, 92 episodes of recurrent urinary infection occurred, as compared to six during treatment (none occurred on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole). These results confirm the value of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for high-risk patient with recurrent urinary infections. Prophylaxis with nitrofurantoin macrocrystals seems adequate for less severe problems of reinfection.
OpenAlex reports 162 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We examined bacterial persistence and resistance in the vaginal and fecal flora of 28 women who received a total of 253 months of daily low-dosage prophylaxis with nitrofurantoin macrocystals (100 mg per day) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (40 and 200 mg respectively). During trimethoprim-sulfamehtoxazole prophylaxis, 8.5% of monthly vaginal and 27% of monthly fecal cultures grew Escherichia coli, as compared to 36 and 96%, respectively for nitrofurantoin macrocrystals. Esch. coli resistant to nitrofurantoin occurred in two of 95 fecal cultures during therapy, and Esch. coli resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in 16 of 182 (8.8%) fecal cultures. In the 12 months before treatment, 92 episodes of recurrent urinary infection occurred, as compared to six during treatment (none occurred on trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole). These results confirm the value of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis for high-risk patient with recurrent urinary infections. Prophylaxis with nitrofurantoin macrocrystals seems adequate for less severe problems of reinfection.
Key concepts: Medicine, Nitrofurantoin, Sulfamethoxazole, Trimethoprim, Urinary system, Anti-Infective Agents, Intensive care medicine, Antibiotics