2014Educational Research and ReviewsOpen access

Mathematics teachers criteria of dimension

Ural Alattin

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine mathematics teachers’ decisions about dimensions of the geometric figures, criteria of dimension and consistency of decision-criteria. The research is a qualitative research and the model applied in the study is descriptive method on the basis of general scanning model. 15 mathematics teachers attended the research. Familiar geometric objects were given and asked to decide their dimensions. The question of “how do you decide the dimension of a geometric object” was used to determine their criteria of dimension. Descriptive analysis was conducted for this question. The results revealed that half of the mathematics teachers indicated a criterion. The criteria of area-volume and length-width-height were common used criteria. It was seen that their criteria and decisions weren’t consistent due to lack of their knowledge of geometric object and concepts of area and volume. Key words: Criteria of Dimension, Concept of Dimension

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of the study is to determine mathematics teachers’ decisions about dimensions of the geometric figures, criteria of dimension and consistency of decision-criteria. The research is a qualitative research and the model applied in the study is descriptive method on the basis of general scanning model. 15 mathematics teachers attended the research. Familiar geometric objects were given and asked to decide their dimensions. The question of “how do you decide the dimension of a geometric object” was used to determine their criteria of dimension. Descriptive analysis was conducted for this question. The results revealed that half of the mathematics teachers indicated a criterion. The criteria of area-volume and length-width-height were common used criteria. It was seen that their criteria and decisions weren’t consistent due to lack of their knowledge of geometric object and concepts of area and volume. Key words: Criteria of Dimension, Concept of Dimension

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of the study is to determine mathematics teachers’ decisions about dimensions of the geometric figures, criteria of dimension and consistency of decision-criteria. The research is a qualitative research and the model applied in the study is descriptive method on the basis of general scanning model. 15 mathematics teachers attended the research. Familiar geometric objects were given and asked to decide their dimensions. The question of “how do you decide the dimension of a geometric object” was used to determine their criteria of dimension. Descriptive analysis was conducted for this question. The results revealed that half of the mathematics teachers indicated a criterion. The criteria of area-volume and length-width-height were common used criteria. It was seen that their criteria and decisions weren’t consistent due to lack of their knowledge of geometric object and concepts of area and volume. Key words: Criteria of Dimension, Concept of Dimension

Key concepts: Mathematics education, Dimension (graph theory), Mathematics, Pure mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Mathematics teachers criteria of dimension — Research Paper | ScholarLens