Popper, Marxism and the Nature of Social Laws
Hugh V. McLachlan
Abstract
Hugh V. McLachlan
Abstract
Let us first of all look at what Popper says about the scientific status of Marxism in relation to Popper's proposed criteria of'science'. It is usually said that Popper offers a criterion of science. For instance, Hindess talks of: '. . . Popper's demarcation criterion between science and non-science . . .'.1 And it is possible to quote passages from Popper's writings which support such an interpretation. He considers himself to have solved:
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Let us first of all look at what Popper says about the scientific status of Marxism in relation to Popper's proposed criteria of'science'. It is usually said that Popper offers a criterion of science. For instance, Hindess talks of: '. . . Popper's demarcation criterion between science and non-science . . .'.1 And it is possible to quote passages from Popper's writings which support such an interpretation. He considers himself to have solved:
Key concepts: Sociology, Political science, Epistemology, Law and economics, Law, Philosophy