2014International Journal of Industrial and Systems EngineeringRequires access

A comparative study of wealth effects of China's bond markets - the empirical analysis based on co-integration and ECM and state space model

Decai Zhou, Tao Zhong, Wenping Qi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since the concept of wealth effect was introduced, scholarly studies mainly focus on the stock markets and the real estate markets, and less on bond markets. Given China’s bond market is divided into the interbank bond market and exchange bond market, firstly, we use co-integration and error correction models to test the static wealth effect of the two markets, find that there are significant long-term wealth effects, while the short-term wealth effects are not obvious. Compared with the exchange bond market, the wealth effect of the interbank bond market is higher than it. Then, we use state space models to test the dynamic wealth effect of the two markets, the results show that they are both obvious, and the interbank bond market’s is higher, but the gap diminishes gradually. In view of the significant wealth effect difference between the two markets, we suggest that China unify the two bond markets in order to bring the bigger wealth effect.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the concept of wealth effect was introduced, scholarly studies mainly focus on the stock markets and the real estate markets, and less on bond markets. Given China’s bond market is divided into the interbank bond market and exchange bond market, firstly, we use co-integration and error correction models to test the static wealth effect of the two markets, find that there are significant long-term wealth effects, while the short-term wealth effects are not obvious. Compared with the exchange bond market, the wealth effect of the interbank bond market is higher than it. Then, we use state space models to test the dynamic wealth effect of the two markets, the results show that they are both obvious, and the interbank bond market’s is higher, but the gap diminishes gradually. In view of the significant wealth effect difference between the two markets, we suggest that China unify the two bond markets in order to bring the bigger wealth effect.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the concept of wealth effect was introduced, scholarly studies mainly focus on the stock markets and the real estate markets, and less on bond markets. Given China’s bond market is divided into the interbank bond market and exchange bond market, firstly, we use co-integration and error correction models to test the static wealth effect of the two markets, find that there are significant long-term wealth effects, while the short-term wealth effects are not obvious. Compared with the exchange bond market, the wealth effect of the interbank bond market is higher than it. Then, we use state space models to test the dynamic wealth effect of the two markets, the results show that they are both obvious, and the interbank bond market’s is higher, but the gap diminishes gradually. In view of the significant wealth effect difference between the two markets, we suggest that China unify the two bond markets in order to bring the bigger wealth effect.

Key concepts: Bond market, Bond, Bond market index, Economics, Real estate, China, Market depth, Order (exchange)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of wealth effects of China's bond markets - the empirical analysis based on co-integration and ECM and state space model — Research Paper | ScholarLens