2016Offshore Technology Conference AsiaRequires access

Complex Subsea to Subsea Pigging Operations of Pipelines

Per A. Nesje

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives/Scope Operators of subsea pipelines sometimes find advantages in performing subsea to subsea pigging operations. This type of pigging may be necessary in order to facilitate a specific field layout or concept. However, operational pigging and inspection pigging from subsea pig launchers to subsea pig receivers can create several design and operational challenges. These are identified and addressed in this paper. Methods, Procedures, Process Two main types of pigging operations are identified. The main challenges are: Results, Observations, Conclusions The methods and the solutions that we have chosen to use in recent projects are described. The background information leading up to the decisions and choices taken will be discussed. Special focus will be given to the importance of planning for any subsea operational and/or inspection pigging up front in the field layout and design phases, i.e. at the same time as the commissioning pigging is defined. The need for a reliable and safe pig tracking management system will be addressed and our observations with respect to this issue will be included. The specific advantages for the Subsea Automated Pig Launcher will be highlighted, a short list of these are: Novel/Additive Information This paper will present practical and sound solutions of how to perform subsea to subsea operational and inspection pigging in a cost effective and safe manner. It will also highlight and explain the importance of planning for any subsea operational and/or inspection pigging up front in the field layout and design phase. This is often not a high focus element and this can result in very costly modifications later in the field life.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Objectives/Scope Operators of subsea pipelines sometimes find advantages in performing subsea to subsea pigging operations. This type of pigging may be necessary in order to facilitate a specific field layout or concept. However, operational pigging and inspection pigging from subsea pig launchers to subsea pig receivers can create several design and operational challenges. These are identified and addressed in this paper. Methods, Procedures, Process Two main types of pigging operations are identified. The main challenges are: Results, Observations, Conclusions The methods and the solutions that we have chosen to use in recent projects are described. The background information leading up to the decisions and choices taken will be discussed. Special focus will be given to the importance of planning for any subsea operational and/or inspection pigging up front in the field layout and design phases, i.e. at the same time as the commissioning pigging is defined. The need for a reliable and safe pig tracking management system will be addressed and our observations with respect to this issue will be included. The specific advantages for the Subsea Automated Pig Launcher will be highlighted, a short list of these are: Novel/Additive Information This paper will present practical and sound solutions of how to perform subsea to subsea operational and inspection pigging in a cost effective and safe manner. It will also highlight and explain the importance of planning for any subsea operational and/or inspection pigging up front in the field layout and design phase. This is often not a high focus element and this can result in very costly modifications later in the field life.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Objectives/Scope Operators of subsea pipelines sometimes find advantages in performing subsea to subsea pigging operations. This type of pigging may be necessary in order to facilitate a specific field layout or concept. However, operational pigging and inspection pigging from subsea pig launchers to subsea pig receivers can create several design and operational challenges. These are identified and addressed in this paper. Methods, Procedures, Process Two main types of pigging operations are identified. The main challenges are: Results, Observations, Conclusions The methods and the solutions that we have chosen to use in recent projects are described. The background information leading up to the decisions and choices taken will be discussed. Special focus will be given to the importance of planning for any subsea operational and/or inspection pigging up front in the field layout and design phases, i.e. at the same time as the commissioning pigging is defined. The need for a reliable and safe pig tracking management system will be addressed and our observations with respect to this issue will be included. The specific advantages for the Subsea Automated Pig Launcher will be highlighted, a short list of these are: Novel/Additive Information This paper will present practical and sound solutions of how to perform subsea to subsea operational and inspection pigging in a cost effective and safe manner. It will also highlight and explain the importance of planning for any subsea operational and/or inspection pigging up front in the field layout and design phase. This is often not a high focus element and this can result in very costly modifications later in the field life.

Key concepts: Subsea, Pigging, Pipeline transport, Computer science, Marine engineering, Field (mathematics), Engineering, Systems engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Complex Subsea to Subsea Pigging Operations of Pipelines — Research Paper | ScholarLens