2005Unpublished venueRequires access

"Growth" in the theory of the firm: What role for entrepreneurship?

Pál Czeglédi, Judit Kapás

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

When explaining growth, the firm as its generator should be integrated into the theory. In this spirit, the aim of this paper is to connect growth theory to the theory of the firm. Since there is no such a link in neoclassical economics, we propose the Austrian economics as a framework to make a bridge, through the concept of entrepreneurship, between these two theories. We build our theory upon two concepts: the extended Kirznerian concept of entrepreneurship (Kirzner 1999) and those of physical and social technologies (Nelson 2002). Based on these, we differentiate between two types of entrepreneurship, both contributing to growth. The first is innovation which is an entrepreneurial act shifting the production possibility frontier (PPF) out. The second is spread which pushes the economy from an inefficient point towards an efficient one on the PPF. The essence of the firm in our theory resides in these two kinds of entrepreneurial acts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

When explaining growth, the firm as its generator should be integrated into the theory. In this spirit, the aim of this paper is to connect growth theory to the theory of the firm. Since there is no such a link in neoclassical economics, we propose the Austrian economics as a framework to make a bridge, through the concept of entrepreneurship, between these two theories. We build our theory upon two concepts: the extended Kirznerian concept of entrepreneurship (Kirzner 1999) and those of physical and social technologies (Nelson 2002). Based on these, we differentiate between two types of entrepreneurship, both contributing to growth. The first is innovation which is an entrepreneurial act shifting the production possibility frontier (PPF) out. The second is spread which pushes the economy from an inefficient point towards an efficient one on the PPF. The essence of the firm in our theory resides in these two kinds of entrepreneurial acts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

When explaining growth, the firm as its generator should be integrated into the theory. In this spirit, the aim of this paper is to connect growth theory to the theory of the firm. Since there is no such a link in neoclassical economics, we propose the Austrian economics as a framework to make a bridge, through the concept of entrepreneurship, between these two theories. We build our theory upon two concepts: the extended Kirznerian concept of entrepreneurship (Kirzner 1999) and those of physical and social technologies (Nelson 2002). Based on these, we differentiate between two types of entrepreneurship, both contributing to growth. The first is innovation which is an entrepreneurial act shifting the production possibility frontier (PPF) out. The second is spread which pushes the economy from an inefficient point towards an efficient one on the PPF. The essence of the firm in our theory resides in these two kinds of entrepreneurial acts.

Key concepts: Entrepreneurship, Neoclassical economics, Theory of the firm, Economics, Growth theory, Frontier, Production theory, Production (economics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
"Growth" in the theory of the firm: What role for entrepreneurship? — Research Paper | ScholarLens