2008PubMedRequires access

Measurement of soft tissue compliance with pressure using ultrasonography.

Won Kim, Sun Gun Chung, T. W. Kim, Kwan Sik Seo

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

Lymphedema is swelling, particularly in the subcutaneous tissues, due to accumulation of lymph. Previous imaging techniques have demonstrated associated structural changes and have been used for evaluating the status of soft tissues. However, the reliability of measurements using ultrasonography has not been evaluated and the ultrasonographic method has been unable to show changes in tissue softness. There is a need to determine if ultrasonography is a reliable technique to assess skin and subcutaneous thickness in the upper extremities with or without pressure and if the measure of compliance in soft tissue thickness is also reliable. Two examiners measured tissue thicknesses using ultrasonography and calculated the compliance with and without pressure on the forearm and upper arm, independently. The intra- and inter-rater cross-correlation coefficients of measuring soft tissue thickness were excellent (> 0.75) in the forearm (p < 0.05). In the upper arm, the reliabilities were fair-to-good. The intraclass correlation coefficients of pressure compliance in the forearm and upper arm were excellent and fair-to-good, respectively (p < 0.05). This study suggests that measurement of thickness of soft tissues using ultrasonography may be reliable and pressure compliance may reflect tissue softness in the upper extremity.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Lymphedema is swelling, particularly in the subcutaneous tissues, due to accumulation of lymph. Previous imaging techniques have demonstrated associated structural changes and have been used for evaluating the status of soft tissues. However, the reliability of measurements using ultrasonography has not been evaluated and the ultrasonographic method has been unable to show changes in tissue softness. There is a need to determine if ultrasonography is a reliable technique to assess skin and subcutaneous thickness in the upper extremities with or without pressure and if the measure of compliance in soft tissue thickness is also reliable. Two examiners measured tissue thicknesses using ultrasonography and calculated the compliance with and without pressure on the forearm and upper arm, independently. The intra- and inter-rater cross-correlation coefficients of measuring soft tissue thickness were excellent (> 0.75) in the forearm (p < 0.05). In the upper arm, the reliabilities were fair-to-good. The intraclass correlation coefficients of pressure compliance in the forearm and upper arm were excellent and fair-to-good, respectively (p < 0.05). This study suggests that measurement of thickness of soft tissues using ultrasonography may be reliable and pressure compliance may reflect tissue softness in the upper extremity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Lymphedema is swelling, particularly in the subcutaneous tissues, due to accumulation of lymph. Previous imaging techniques have demonstrated associated structural changes and have been used for evaluating the status of soft tissues. However, the reliability of measurements using ultrasonography has not been evaluated and the ultrasonographic method has been unable to show changes in tissue softness. There is a need to determine if ultrasonography is a reliable technique to assess skin and subcutaneous thickness in the upper extremities with or without pressure and if the measure of compliance in soft tissue thickness is also reliable. Two examiners measured tissue thicknesses using ultrasonography and calculated the compliance with and without pressure on the forearm and upper arm, independently. The intra- and inter-rater cross-correlation coefficients of measuring soft tissue thickness were excellent (> 0.75) in the forearm (p < 0.05). In the upper arm, the reliabilities were fair-to-good. The intraclass correlation coefficients of pressure compliance in the forearm and upper arm were excellent and fair-to-good, respectively (p < 0.05). This study suggests that measurement of thickness of soft tissues using ultrasonography may be reliable and pressure compliance may reflect tissue softness in the upper extremity.

Key concepts: Forearm, Soft tissue, Ultrasonography, Intraclass correlation, Compliance (psychology), Lymphedema, Medicine, Subcutaneous tissue

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement of soft tissue compliance with pressure using ultrasonography. — Research Paper | ScholarLens