1994Journal of Water Management ModelingOpen access

Comparison of Two Methods of End-of-Pipe Control for CSO and Stormwater

MacViro Genivar, Mario Conetta, W. Wichmann, City of Toronto, Mario Parente

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Control and treatment of stormwater discharges and combined sewer overflows (CSO) from w•ban areas are issues of increasing importance in the field of water quality management.The City of Toronto has identified water quality problems resulting from these discharges and has undertaken to develop a Sewer System Master Plan for the virtual elimination of CSO and the control/ treatment of stonnwater runoff prior to discharge to receiving waters.The CSO outfalls contribute approximately 71% of average annual volume and the stonnwater outfalls 29%.It has been detennined that for the City of Toronto the most effective means of controlling the CSO problem is to intercept CSO in a storage facility and then direct the intercepted CSO to a treatment facility at an Conetta, M., W. Wichmann and M. Parente.1994."Comparison of Two Methods of End-of-Pipe Control for CSO and Storm water."Journal of Water Management Modeling R 176-20.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Control and treatment of stormwater discharges and combined sewer overflows (CSO) from w•ban areas are issues of increasing importance in the field of water quality management.The City of Toronto has identified water quality problems resulting from these discharges and has undertaken to develop a Sewer System Master Plan for the virtual elimination of CSO and the control/ treatment of stonnwater runoff prior to discharge to receiving waters.The CSO outfalls contribute approximately 71% of average annual volume and the stonnwater outfalls 29%.It has been detennined that for the City of Toronto the most effective means of controlling the CSO problem is to intercept CSO in a storage facility and then direct the intercepted CSO to a treatment facility at an Conetta, M., W. Wichmann and M. Parente.1994."Comparison of Two Methods of End-of-Pipe Control for CSO and Storm water."Journal of Water Management Modeling R 176-20.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Control and treatment of stormwater discharges and combined sewer overflows (CSO) from w•ban areas are issues of increasing importance in the field of water quality management.The City of Toronto has identified water quality problems resulting from these discharges and has undertaken to develop a Sewer System Master Plan for the virtual elimination of CSO and the control/ treatment of stonnwater runoff prior to discharge to receiving waters.The CSO outfalls contribute approximately 71% of average annual volume and the stonnwater outfalls 29%.It has been detennined that for the City of Toronto the most effective means of controlling the CSO problem is to intercept CSO in a storage facility and then direct the intercepted CSO to a treatment facility at an Conetta, M., W. Wichmann and M. Parente.1994."Comparison of Two Methods of End-of-Pipe Control for CSO and Storm water."Journal of Water Management Modeling R 176-20.

Key concepts: Combined sewer, Stormwater, Environmental science, Stormwater management, Environmental engineering, Hydrology (agriculture), Sanitary sewer, Surface runoff

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Two Methods of End-of-Pipe Control for CSO and Stormwater — Research Paper | ScholarLens