Dissenting creditor rights in UK SOAs.
Jo Windsor, Nick Le Masurier
Abstract
Jo Windsor, Nick Le Masurier
Abstract
The article looks at the deterioration of the ability of a dissenting creditor to disrupt or derail a scheme of arrangement (SOA) caused by the emerging trends in schemes of arrangement, including the popularity of amend and extend schemes and the use of settlement, in Great Britain. Topics covered include the strategies used by a creditor intending to block a SOA, the disadvantages of SOA, and the procedure of voting on a SOA within a company.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The article looks at the deterioration of the ability of a dissenting creditor to disrupt or derail a scheme of arrangement (SOA) caused by the emerging trends in schemes of arrangement, including the popularity of amend and extend schemes and the use of settlement, in Great Britain. Topics covered include the strategies used by a creditor intending to block a SOA, the disadvantages of SOA, and the procedure of voting on a SOA within a company.
Key concepts: Dissenting opinion, Creditor, Settlement (finance), Voting, Popularity, Business, Law and economics, Restructuring