2014Deutsches Ärzteblatt internationalOpen access

Possible Harms of Theophylline in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Claus Vogelmeier

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

Further limitations are that the patients were not selected in random fashion and there were no strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.However, this also represents a strength of the study, in that randomized controlled trials have high internal validity but only low external validity-in other words, they are an incomplete reflection of reality.Two particular aspects of the study enhance its validity: First, the patients were participating in a structured disease management program (DMP), so their management is likely to have been optimal.Second, the authors used propensity score matching.This is a statistical technique employed in observation studies to avoid potential bias and render populations comparable at the beginning of the study period.The baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients after matching show that this procedure was successful.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Further limitations are that the patients were not selected in random fashion and there were no strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.However, this also represents a strength of the study, in that randomized controlled trials have high internal validity but only low external validity-in other words, they are an incomplete reflection of reality.Two particular aspects of the study enhance its validity: First, the patients were participating in a structured disease management program (DMP), so their management is likely to have been optimal.Second, the authors used propensity score matching.This is a statistical technique employed in observation studies to avoid potential bias and render populations comparable at the beginning of the study period.The baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients after matching show that this procedure was successful.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Further limitations are that the patients were not selected in random fashion and there were no strict inclusion and exclusion criteria.However, this also represents a strength of the study, in that randomized controlled trials have high internal validity but only low external validity-in other words, they are an incomplete reflection of reality.Two particular aspects of the study enhance its validity: First, the patients were participating in a structured disease management program (DMP), so their management is likely to have been optimal.Second, the authors used propensity score matching.This is a statistical technique employed in observation studies to avoid potential bias and render populations comparable at the beginning of the study period.The baseline characteristics of the two groups of patients after matching show that this procedure was successful.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pulmonary disease, Theophylline, Intensive care medicine, MEDLINE, Internal medicine, Law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Possible Harms of Theophylline in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens