2008•The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University)Requires access

Public Concerns of Illegal Immigration and Ideology

Robert J. Gulotty

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

How does affective response to Hispanics relate to restrictionist border policy proposals? I argue a form of ideologically mediated pro- or anti-Hispanic affect better explains restrictionist sentiment than a variety of competing theories of immigration politics. Such alternative viewpoints include the realistic threat hypothesis, the “security dilemma” framework, “principled conservativism,” and finally, symbolic racism originating from the protestant ethic and unfiltered negative affect toward Hispanics. In contrast to these theories that take up structural features of economics, interethnic conflict, or disputes of ideology as the cause of insecurity, I argue that ideology acts as an enabling device that determines whether the negative affect will result in certain justifications for restrictionist immigration policy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

How does affective response to Hispanics relate to restrictionist border policy proposals? I argue a form of ideologically mediated pro- or anti-Hispanic affect better explains restrictionist sentiment than a variety of competing theories of immigration politics. Such alternative viewpoints include the realistic threat hypothesis, the “security dilemma” framework, “principled conservativism,” and finally, symbolic racism originating from the protestant ethic and unfiltered negative affect toward Hispanics. In contrast to these theories that take up structural features of economics, interethnic conflict, or disputes of ideology as the cause of insecurity, I argue that ideology acts as an enabling device that determines whether the negative affect will result in certain justifications for restrictionist immigration policy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

How does affective response to Hispanics relate to restrictionist border policy proposals? I argue a form of ideologically mediated pro- or anti-Hispanic affect better explains restrictionist sentiment than a variety of competing theories of immigration politics. Such alternative viewpoints include the realistic threat hypothesis, the “security dilemma” framework, “principled conservativism,” and finally, symbolic racism originating from the protestant ethic and unfiltered negative affect toward Hispanics. In contrast to these theories that take up structural features of economics, interethnic conflict, or disputes of ideology as the cause of insecurity, I argue that ideology acts as an enabling device that determines whether the negative affect will result in certain justifications for restrictionist immigration policy.

Key concepts: Immigration, Ideology, Political science, Illegal immigration, Criminology, Computer security, Political economy, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Public Concerns of Illegal Immigration and Ideology — Research Paper | ScholarLens