2012Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)Open access

Life cycle energy use of a zero-energy house

Eline Himpe, Leen Trappers, Marlies Van Holm, Arnold Janssens, Marc Delghust, Wim Debacker, Jan Moens

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Taking the building sector’s huge impact on the environment into consideration, the European Union aims at ‘nearly zero-energy’ houses by 2021 through strict requirements for the (non-renewable) operational energy use. Although it is not included in current calculation methods, the life cycle energy use of buildings is an aspect of growing interest, encompassing both the operational energy use throughout the building service life and the life cycle embodied energy and end-of-life energy in building materials. This contribution examines the life cycle energy use of a zero-energy case study house by means of a life cycle energy assessment and contains a parameter analysis of its different components, such as the building construction and building services. The results show that, during its entire lifecycle, a zero-energy house uses 2 to 4 times less non-renewable energy than a passive house with identical floor plan and 3 to 5 times less than a house built according to standard building practice in Belgium. Secondly, the embodied energy in a zero-energy house with a passive building envelope proves to be equal to that in a zero-energy house with a standard building envelope. Thus, passive house requirements are not considered an essential criterion for zero-energy houses from life cycle energy point of view. On the other hand, the study reveals that the choice of building construction materials and building services are determining factors for the life cycle energy use, resulting in energy savings up to 35 kWh/year/m² for zero-energy houses.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Taking the building sector’s huge impact on the environment into consideration, the European Union aims at ‘nearly zero-energy’ houses by 2021 through strict requirements for the (non-renewable) operational energy use. Although it is not included in current calculation methods, the life cycle energy use of buildings is an aspect of growing interest, encompassing both the operational energy use throughout the building service life and the life cycle embodied energy and end-of-life energy in building materials. This contribution examines the life cycle energy use of a zero-energy case study house by means of a life cycle energy assessment and contains a parameter analysis of its different components, such as the building construction and building services. The results show that, during its entire lifecycle, a zero-energy house uses 2 to 4 times less non-renewable energy than a passive house with identical floor plan and 3 to 5 times less than a house built according to standard building practice in Belgium. Secondly, the embodied energy in a zero-energy house with a passive building envelope proves to be equal to that in a zero-energy house with a standard building envelope. Thus, passive house requirements are not considered an essential criterion for zero-energy houses from life cycle energy point of view. On the other hand, the study reveals that the choice of building construction materials and building services are determining factors for the life cycle energy use, resulting in energy savings up to 35 kWh/year/m² for zero-energy houses.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Taking the building sector’s huge impact on the environment into consideration, the European Union aims at ‘nearly zero-energy’ houses by 2021 through strict requirements for the (non-renewable) operational energy use. Although it is not included in current calculation methods, the life cycle energy use of buildings is an aspect of growing interest, encompassing both the operational energy use throughout the building service life and the life cycle embodied energy and end-of-life energy in building materials. This contribution examines the life cycle energy use of a zero-energy case study house by means of a life cycle energy assessment and contains a parameter analysis of its different components, such as the building construction and building services. The results show that, during its entire lifecycle, a zero-energy house uses 2 to 4 times less non-renewable energy than a passive house with identical floor plan and 3 to 5 times less than a house built according to standard building practice in Belgium. Secondly, the embodied energy in a zero-energy house with a passive building envelope proves to be equal to that in a zero-energy house with a standard building envelope. Thus, passive house requirements are not considered an essential criterion for zero-energy houses from life cycle energy point of view. On the other hand, the study reveals that the choice of building construction materials and building services are determining factors for the life cycle energy use, resulting in energy savings up to 35 kWh/year/m² for zero-energy houses.

Key concepts: Embodied energy, Zero-energy building, Passive house, Energy (signal processing), Building envelope, Single-family detached home, Architectural engineering, Renewable energy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Life cycle energy use of a zero-energy house — Research Paper | ScholarLens