2015•ECS Meeting AbstractsRequires access

Ab Initio Study Of Li2O2 On Noble Metal (Pt, Au, Pd), Pt3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) Alloy And Pd3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) Alloy Surfaces

Shrihari Sankarasubramanian, Jeongwook Seo, Fuminori Mizuno, Nikhilendra Singh, Jai Prakash

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Li- O2 cells has shown great potential to be one of the energy storage systems with energetic capabilities beyond the lithium-ion cell. The early ab-initio theoretical picture of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) at the cathode envisioned a Li2O2 covered surface after the initial cycle and further ORR as occurring on the deposited Li2O2[2]. Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies invoking such mechanisms have predicted enlarged overpotentials in agreement with experimentally observed high overpotentials. But the issue of electron transfer across the poorly conducting peroxide layer in spite of low conductivity has had to be explained using mechanisms such as d-band bending [2] and poloron hopping [3]. This picture of an electrode surface that is covered and does not influence the ORR or influences it by an indirect at-distance mechanism is at odds with experimental evidence that the surface plays a crucial role in the ORR. ORR on Noble metals [1], metal oxide [4], metal alloys [5], and carbon nanotubes [6] has been reported to occur with reduced overpotential and longer cycle life. Also studies of the cathode surface have shown that the Li2O2 nucleates in various 3-D morphologies [6] and even after multiple cycles a significant portion of the surface is bare [6]. The present study addresses the twin challenges of understanding the binding of Li2O2 on active sites and identifying possible candidate materials which would facilitate easy removal of deposited Li2O2 during the charge process. The Li2O2 binding energy (B.ELi2O2) was calculated using DFT on periodic models of noble metal (Pt, Au, Pd), Pt3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) alloy and Pd3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) alloy surfaces after geometric optimization and by bonding Li2O2 to the surfaces at various orientations and sites. The effect of the various sites on the binding energy and the variation of the binding energy at each site with the change in material were studied. Top and Bridge sites were found to have the lowest B.ELi2O2 in case of the noble metals. Systematic permutation of the first two atomic layers of FCC (111) Pt3M and Pd3Mskin alloys slabs was carried out to find the most stable geometric surface configuration and the influence of the dopant modification of the lattice constant on the B.ELi2O2. Possible guidelines for future alloy design to achieve desired B.ELi2O2 values were formulated and B.ELi2O2 was shown to be a key parameter for screening future Li-O2ORR catalyst candidates Acknowledgement: Use of the Center for Nanoscale Materials was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. References: Y-C Lu, H.A. Gasteiger, E. Crumlin, R. McGuire, Jr., Y. Shao-Horn; J. Electrochem. Soc., 157 (9), A1016-A1025 (2010). Hummelshøj, J.S; Blomqvist,J; Datta,S.; Vegge, T.; Rossmeisl,J.; Thygesen, K.S.; Luntz,A.C.; Jacobsen,K.W.; Nørskov,J.K.; J.Chem.Phys., 132(2010), 071101. J. M. Garcia-Lastra, J. S. G. Myrdal, R. Christensen, K. S. Thygesen, T. Vegge; J. Phys. Chem. C, 117(2013), 5568−5577. A. Debart, J. Bao, G. Armstrong, P.G. Bruce; J. Pow. Soc., 174(2007) 1177–1182. Dobley, A.; Morein, C.; Abraham, K. M. In 208th ECS Meeting, Los Angeles, CA,USA, 2005; p Abstract #823 S. Nakanishi, F. Mizuno, K. Nobuhara, T. Abe, H.Iba; Carbon, 50(2012) 4794 – 4803. Figure 1

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Li- O2 cells has shown great potential to be one of the energy storage systems with energetic capabilities beyond the lithium-ion cell. The early ab-initio theoretical picture of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) at the cathode envisioned a Li2O2 covered surface after the initial cycle and further ORR as occurring on the deposited Li2O2[2]. Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies invoking such mechanisms have predicted enlarged overpotentials in agreement with experimentally observed high overpotentials. But the issue of electron transfer across the poorly conducting peroxide layer in spite of low conductivity has had to be explained using mechanisms such as d-band bending [2] and poloron hopping [3]. This picture of an electrode surface that is covered and does not influence the ORR or influences it by an indirect at-distance mechanism is at odds with experimental evidence that the surface plays a crucial role in the ORR. ORR on Noble metals [1], metal oxide [4], metal alloys [5], and carbon nanotubes [6] has been reported to occur with reduced overpotential and longer cycle life. Also studies of the cathode surface have shown that the Li2O2 nucleates in various 3-D morphologies [6] and even after multiple cycles a significant portion of the surface is bare [6]. The present study addresses the twin challenges of understanding the binding of Li2O2 on active sites and identifying possible candidate materials which would facilitate easy removal of deposited Li2O2 during the charge process. The Li2O2 binding energy (B.ELi2O2) was calculated using DFT on periodic models of noble metal (Pt, Au, Pd), Pt3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) alloy and Pd3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) alloy surfaces after geometric optimization and by bonding Li2O2 to the surfaces at various orientations and sites. The effect of the various sites on the binding energy and the variation of the binding energy at each site with the change in material were studied. Top and Bridge sites were found to have the lowest B.ELi2O2 in case of the noble metals. Systematic permutation of the first two atomic layers of FCC (111) Pt3M and Pd3Mskin alloys slabs was carried out to find the most stable geometric surface configuration and the influence of the dopant modification of the lattice constant on the B.ELi2O2. Possible guidelines for future alloy design to achieve desired B.ELi2O2 values were formulated and B.ELi2O2 was shown to be a key parameter for screening future Li-O2ORR catalyst candidates Acknowledgement: Use of the Center for Nanoscale Materials was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. References: Y-C Lu, H.A. Gasteiger, E. Crumlin, R. McGuire, Jr., Y. Shao-Horn; J. Electrochem. Soc., 157 (9), A1016-A1025 (2010). Hummelshøj, J.S; Blomqvist,J; Datta,S.; Vegge, T.; Rossmeisl,J.; Thygesen, K.S.; Luntz,A.C.; Jacobsen,K.W.; Nørskov,J.K.; J.Chem.Phys., 132(2010), 071101. J. M. Garcia-Lastra, J. S. G. Myrdal, R. Christensen, K. S. Thygesen, T. Vegge; J. Phys. Chem. C, 117(2013), 5568−5577. A. Debart, J. Bao, G. Armstrong, P.G. Bruce; J. Pow. Soc., 174(2007) 1177–1182. Dobley, A.; Morein, C.; Abraham, K. M. In 208th ECS Meeting, Los Angeles, CA,USA, 2005; p Abstract #823 S. Nakanishi, F. Mizuno, K. Nobuhara, T. Abe, H.Iba; Carbon, 50(2012) 4794 – 4803. Figure 1

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Li- O2 cells has shown great potential to be one of the energy storage systems with energetic capabilities beyond the lithium-ion cell. The early ab-initio theoretical picture of the Oxygen Reduction Reaction (ORR) at the cathode envisioned a Li2O2 covered surface after the initial cycle and further ORR as occurring on the deposited Li2O2[2]. Density Functional Theory (DFT) studies invoking such mechanisms have predicted enlarged overpotentials in agreement with experimentally observed high overpotentials. But the issue of electron transfer across the poorly conducting peroxide layer in spite of low conductivity has had to be explained using mechanisms such as d-band bending [2] and poloron hopping [3]. This picture of an electrode surface that is covered and does not influence the ORR or influences it by an indirect at-distance mechanism is at odds with experimental evidence that the surface plays a crucial role in the ORR. ORR on Noble metals [1], metal oxide [4], metal alloys [5], and carbon nanotubes [6] has been reported to occur with reduced overpotential and longer cycle life. Also studies of the cathode surface have shown that the Li2O2 nucleates in various 3-D morphologies [6] and even after multiple cycles a significant portion of the surface is bare [6]. The present study addresses the twin challenges of understanding the binding of Li2O2 on active sites and identifying possible candidate materials which would facilitate easy removal of deposited Li2O2 during the charge process. The Li2O2 binding energy (B.ELi2O2) was calculated using DFT on periodic models of noble metal (Pt, Au, Pd), Pt3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) alloy and Pd3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) alloy surfaces after geometric optimization and by bonding Li2O2 to the surfaces at various orientations and sites. The effect of the various sites on the binding energy and the variation of the binding energy at each site with the change in material were studied. Top and Bridge sites were found to have the lowest B.ELi2O2 in case of the noble metals. Systematic permutation of the first two atomic layers of FCC (111) Pt3M and Pd3Mskin alloys slabs was carried out to find the most stable geometric surface configuration and the influence of the dopant modification of the lattice constant on the B.ELi2O2. Possible guidelines for future alloy design to achieve desired B.ELi2O2 values were formulated and B.ELi2O2 was shown to be a key parameter for screening future Li-O2ORR catalyst candidates Acknowledgement: Use of the Center for Nanoscale Materials was supported by the U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. References: Y-C Lu, H.A. Gasteiger, E. Crumlin, R. McGuire, Jr., Y. Shao-Horn; J. Electrochem. Soc., 157 (9), A1016-A1025 (2010). Hummelshøj, J.S; Blomqvist,J; Datta,S.; Vegge, T.; Rossmeisl,J.; Thygesen, K.S.; Luntz,A.C.; Jacobsen,K.W.; Nørskov,J.K.; J.Chem.Phys., 132(2010), 071101. J. M. Garcia-Lastra, J. S. G. Myrdal, R. Christensen, K. S. Thygesen, T. Vegge; J. Phys. Chem. C, 117(2013), 5568−5577. A. Debart, J. Bao, G. Armstrong, P.G. Bruce; J. Pow. Soc., 174(2007) 1177–1182. Dobley, A.; Morein, C.; Abraham, K. M. In 208th ECS Meeting, Los Angeles, CA,USA, 2005; p Abstract #823 S. Nakanishi, F. Mizuno, K. Nobuhara, T. Abe, H.Iba; Carbon, 50(2012) 4794 – 4803. Figure 1

Key concepts: Overpotential, Density functional theory, Ab initio, Materials science, Noble metal, Alloy, Oxide, Cathode

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ab Initio Study Of Li2O2 On Noble Metal (Pt, Au, Pd), Pt3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) Alloy And Pd3M (M=Fe, Co, Ni, Cu) Alloy Surfaces — Research Paper | ScholarLens