2008PubMedRequires access

Diagnostic laparoscopy in ascites of unknown origin: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital 20-year experience.

Chien-Min Han, Chyi‐Long Lee, Kuan‐Gen Huang, Chia‐Ming Chu, Shi‐Ming Lin, Chin‐Jung Wang, Nari Kay

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ascites may appear with well-recognized disease but, in some situations, ascites is of unknown cause in spite of comprehensive study. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy in patients with ascites of unknown origin, and evaluate the role of laparoscopy in this population after the advent of ultrasonography and computed tomography. METHODS: We collected 20 years' data of diagnostic laparoscopy from retrospective chart review at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou and Taipei. We compared the first 10 years' data with the latter 10 years, in respect of surgical technique evolution and the different contributions of ascites. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy six patients who underwent laparoscopy for ascites of unknown origin were enrolled. They included: (1) carcinomatosis peritonei in 99 cases (56.2%); (2) tuberculous peritonitis in 31 cases (17.6%); (3) cirrhosis in 19 cases (10.8%); and (4) miscellaneous diagnoses in 27 cases (15.4%). Comparing the first 10 years' data with the latter 10 years', the distribution was nearly the same. Carcinomatosis peritonei accounted for the majority of cases and, with the evolution of anti-tuberculosis medicine, the number of tuberculosis cases is decreasing. Liver cirrhosis cases increased during the latter 10 years. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy in combination with biopsy can clarify the causes of unexplained ascites in the majority of cases: it failed to reveal any gross abnormality in only 15% of cases. Therefore, laparoscopy is a valuable tool for the detection of the cause of unexplained ascites.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Ascites may appear with well-recognized disease but, in some situations, ascites is of unknown cause in spite of comprehensive study. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy in patients with ascites of unknown origin, and evaluate the role of laparoscopy in this population after the advent of ultrasonography and computed tomography. METHODS: We collected 20 years' data of diagnostic laparoscopy from retrospective chart review at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou and Taipei. We compared the first 10 years' data with the latter 10 years, in respect of surgical technique evolution and the different contributions of ascites. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy six patients who underwent laparoscopy for ascites of unknown origin were enrolled. They included: (1) carcinomatosis peritonei in 99 cases (56.2%); (2) tuberculous peritonitis in 31 cases (17.6%); (3) cirrhosis in 19 cases (10.8%); and (4) miscellaneous diagnoses in 27 cases (15.4%). Comparing the first 10 years' data with the latter 10 years', the distribution was nearly the same. Carcinomatosis peritonei accounted for the majority of cases and, with the evolution of anti-tuberculosis medicine, the number of tuberculosis cases is decreasing. Liver cirrhosis cases increased during the latter 10 years. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy in combination with biopsy can clarify the causes of unexplained ascites in the majority of cases: it failed to reveal any gross abnormality in only 15% of cases. Therefore, laparoscopy is a valuable tool for the detection of the cause of unexplained ascites.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Ascites may appear with well-recognized disease but, in some situations, ascites is of unknown cause in spite of comprehensive study. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of laparoscopy in patients with ascites of unknown origin, and evaluate the role of laparoscopy in this population after the advent of ultrasonography and computed tomography. METHODS: We collected 20 years' data of diagnostic laparoscopy from retrospective chart review at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Linkou and Taipei. We compared the first 10 years' data with the latter 10 years, in respect of surgical technique evolution and the different contributions of ascites. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy six patients who underwent laparoscopy for ascites of unknown origin were enrolled. They included: (1) carcinomatosis peritonei in 99 cases (56.2%); (2) tuberculous peritonitis in 31 cases (17.6%); (3) cirrhosis in 19 cases (10.8%); and (4) miscellaneous diagnoses in 27 cases (15.4%). Comparing the first 10 years' data with the latter 10 years', the distribution was nearly the same. Carcinomatosis peritonei accounted for the majority of cases and, with the evolution of anti-tuberculosis medicine, the number of tuberculosis cases is decreasing. Liver cirrhosis cases increased during the latter 10 years. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy in combination with biopsy can clarify the causes of unexplained ascites in the majority of cases: it failed to reveal any gross abnormality in only 15% of cases. Therefore, laparoscopy is a valuable tool for the detection of the cause of unexplained ascites.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ascites, Laparoscopy, Cirrhosis, Retrospective cohort study, Tuberculosis, Radiology, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic laparoscopy in ascites of unknown origin: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital 20-year experience. — Research Paper | ScholarLens