2016Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

Opportunity Cost for Society Related to U.S. Truck Size and Weight Regulation: Freight Efficiency

John Woodrooffe

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Improvements in truck freight efficiency through such measures as optimized logistics and truck loading, the utilization of other transportation modes, and the reform of federal truck size and weight policy are expected to require fewer truck trips to move the nation’s freight. This reduction in truck travel distance should bring with it reductions in fuel consumption, emissions, and casualties as a result of reduced exposure. This paper discusses truck size and weight policy domestically and internationally and contrasts U.S. mass efficiency with that of the country’s North American Free Trade Agreement partners and, more broadly, with countries outside of North America. The analysis reveals the outdated nature of U.S. federal size and weight policy compared with other nations. The inability of U.S. federal policy to remain current with other countries is a result of a freeze on policy change that has been in place since 1982. An analysis of the societal benefits associated with improvements in truck freight efficiency is provided. Rather than estimating the precise benefits associated with the many options available, the analysis examines the benefits associated with a 10% reduction in truck travel distance. In this way, the paper provides insight into the significance of improved freight efficiency that reduces total truck travel distance, which in turn provides fuel savings, a reduction in emissions, and a reduction in truck crash frequency. The analysis concludes that a 10% reduction in truck distance traveled for a fixed national freight task would generate approximately $16 billion, save 330 lives, and prevent approximately 4,000 injuries per year.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Improvements in truck freight efficiency through such measures as optimized logistics and truck loading, the utilization of other transportation modes, and the reform of federal truck size and weight policy are expected to require fewer truck trips to move the nation’s freight. This reduction in truck travel distance should bring with it reductions in fuel consumption, emissions, and casualties as a result of reduced exposure. This paper discusses truck size and weight policy domestically and internationally and contrasts U.S. mass efficiency with that of the country’s North American Free Trade Agreement partners and, more broadly, with countries outside of North America. The analysis reveals the outdated nature of U.S. federal size and weight policy compared with other nations. The inability of U.S. federal policy to remain current with other countries is a result of a freeze on policy change that has been in place since 1982. An analysis of the societal benefits associated with improvements in truck freight efficiency is provided. Rather than estimating the precise benefits associated with the many options available, the analysis examines the benefits associated with a 10% reduction in truck travel distance. In this way, the paper provides insight into the significance of improved freight efficiency that reduces total truck travel distance, which in turn provides fuel savings, a reduction in emissions, and a reduction in truck crash frequency. The analysis concludes that a 10% reduction in truck distance traveled for a fixed national freight task would generate approximately $16 billion, save 330 lives, and prevent approximately 4,000 injuries per year.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Improvements in truck freight efficiency through such measures as optimized logistics and truck loading, the utilization of other transportation modes, and the reform of federal truck size and weight policy are expected to require fewer truck trips to move the nation’s freight. This reduction in truck travel distance should bring with it reductions in fuel consumption, emissions, and casualties as a result of reduced exposure. This paper discusses truck size and weight policy domestically and internationally and contrasts U.S. mass efficiency with that of the country’s North American Free Trade Agreement partners and, more broadly, with countries outside of North America. The analysis reveals the outdated nature of U.S. federal size and weight policy compared with other nations. The inability of U.S. federal policy to remain current with other countries is a result of a freeze on policy change that has been in place since 1982. An analysis of the societal benefits associated with improvements in truck freight efficiency is provided. Rather than estimating the precise benefits associated with the many options available, the analysis examines the benefits associated with a 10% reduction in truck travel distance. In this way, the paper provides insight into the significance of improved freight efficiency that reduces total truck travel distance, which in turn provides fuel savings, a reduction in emissions, and a reduction in truck crash frequency. The analysis concludes that a 10% reduction in truck distance traveled for a fixed national freight task would generate approximately $16 billion, save 330 lives, and prevent approximately 4,000 injuries per year.

Key concepts: Truck, Fuel efficiency, TRIPS architecture, Transport engineering, Crash, Consumption (sociology), Vehicle miles of travel, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Opportunity Cost for Society Related to U.S. Truck Size and Weight Regulation: Freight Efficiency — Research Paper | ScholarLens