2016Journal of Survey Statistics and MethodologyRequires access

Reducing Nonresponse and Nonresponse Error in a Telephone Survey: An Informative Case Study

Floyd Jackson Fowler, Anthony Roman, Rumel S. Mahmood, Carol A. Cosenza

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents the results of an effort to raise the response rate for a national survey of adults aged 40 years or older about a number of issues related to Medicare costs. The survey was initially planned as a list-assisted random digit dialing telephone survey, but when the early response rate experience was low, nonrespondents were sent a paper version of the survey by mail with a $10 incentive and asked to respond. The result was that about half of the telephone nonrespondents for whom we had a mail address returned a mail survey, and the 24 percent telephone response rate was raised to 58 percent overall. Moreover, of the sixteen key estimates on which the survey was focused, seven were significantly different as a result of the mail returns. Our experience demonstrates the potential for mail protocols to improve response rates on national surveys and provides another example of low response rates having important effects on the estimates made from survey data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents the results of an effort to raise the response rate for a national survey of adults aged 40 years or older about a number of issues related to Medicare costs. The survey was initially planned as a list-assisted random digit dialing telephone survey, but when the early response rate experience was low, nonrespondents were sent a paper version of the survey by mail with a $10 incentive and asked to respond. The result was that about half of the telephone nonrespondents for whom we had a mail address returned a mail survey, and the 24 percent telephone response rate was raised to 58 percent overall. Moreover, of the sixteen key estimates on which the survey was focused, seven were significantly different as a result of the mail returns. Our experience demonstrates the potential for mail protocols to improve response rates on national surveys and provides another example of low response rates having important effects on the estimates made from survey data.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents the results of an effort to raise the response rate for a national survey of adults aged 40 years or older about a number of issues related to Medicare costs. The survey was initially planned as a list-assisted random digit dialing telephone survey, but when the early response rate experience was low, nonrespondents were sent a paper version of the survey by mail with a $10 incentive and asked to respond. The result was that about half of the telephone nonrespondents for whom we had a mail address returned a mail survey, and the 24 percent telephone response rate was raised to 58 percent overall. Moreover, of the sixteen key estimates on which the survey was focused, seven were significantly different as a result of the mail returns. Our experience demonstrates the potential for mail protocols to improve response rates on national surveys and provides another example of low response rates having important effects on the estimates made from survey data.

Key concepts: Non-response bias, Random digit dialing, Telephone survey, Incentive, Telephone number, Survey data collection, Telephone interview, Survey research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reducing Nonresponse and Nonresponse Error in a Telephone Survey: An Informative Case Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens