2001SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Constructing Multinomial Option Pricing Models: Illustrations for Practice and Education

Larry C. Holland

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Binomial pricing trees are often used to value options. However, binomial models can easily become very large and cumbersome. Multinomial option pricing trees can be constructed that produce results equivalent to binomial option pricing trees. The advantage of creating multinomial trees is that they are smaller and easier to construct than binomial trees. In this paper, trinomial and quintinomial option pricing trees are developed and compared to simple binomial trees, illustrating the similarities and differences. These multinomial pricing trees are much smaller and more compact because they require fewer calculations to produce results equivalent to binomial trees. Methods for valuing put and call options, European and American options, and accounting for dividends are also illustrated. Multinomial option pricing trees can be helpful to students in understanding how the models work and useful to practitioners in constructing simple option pricing models.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Binomial pricing trees are often used to value options. However, binomial models can easily become very large and cumbersome. Multinomial option pricing trees can be constructed that produce results equivalent to binomial option pricing trees. The advantage of creating multinomial trees is that they are smaller and easier to construct than binomial trees. In this paper, trinomial and quintinomial option pricing trees are developed and compared to simple binomial trees, illustrating the similarities and differences. These multinomial pricing trees are much smaller and more compact because they require fewer calculations to produce results equivalent to binomial trees. Methods for valuing put and call options, European and American options, and accounting for dividends are also illustrated. Multinomial option pricing trees can be helpful to students in understanding how the models work and useful to practitioners in constructing simple option pricing models.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Binomial pricing trees are often used to value options. However, binomial models can easily become very large and cumbersome. Multinomial option pricing trees can be constructed that produce results equivalent to binomial option pricing trees. The advantage of creating multinomial trees is that they are smaller and easier to construct than binomial trees. In this paper, trinomial and quintinomial option pricing trees are developed and compared to simple binomial trees, illustrating the similarities and differences. These multinomial pricing trees are much smaller and more compact because they require fewer calculations to produce results equivalent to binomial trees. Methods for valuing put and call options, European and American options, and accounting for dividends are also illustrated. Multinomial option pricing trees can be helpful to students in understanding how the models work and useful to practitioners in constructing simple option pricing models.

Key concepts: Trinomial tree, Binomial options pricing model, Multinomial distribution, Trinomial, Valuation of options, Finite difference methods for option pricing, Binomial (polynomial), Monte Carlo methods for option pricing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Constructing Multinomial Option Pricing Models: Illustrations for Practice and Education — Research Paper | ScholarLens