Lord Armstrong’s EU Bill Amendment shows the way forward for the framing of referendum questions
Sean Kippin
Abstract
Open-access reader
Sean Kippin
Abstract
Open-access reader
The Conservatives EU Referendum Bill fell in Committee stage in the House of Lords, meaning that there is likely to be no referendum on the statute book before the next election. During the Bill’s hearings, Lord Armstrong proposed an amendment to the wording of the proposed question, which took up the suggestions of Democratic Audit and the Electoral Commission, says Sean Kippin.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The Conservatives EU Referendum Bill fell in Committee stage in the House of Lords, meaning that there is likely to be no referendum on the statute book before the next election. During the Bill’s hearings, Lord Armstrong proposed an amendment to the wording of the proposed question, which took up the suggestions of Democratic Audit and the Electoral Commission, says Sean Kippin.
Key concepts: Referendum, Law, Framing (construction), Political science, Ballot, Democracy, Statute, Constitutional amendment