2016PubMedRequires access

The effectiveness of pneumoreduction for intussusception.

Serkan Arslan, Cüneyt Turan, Selim Doğanay, Mahmut Güzel, Özlem Yandim, Ahmet Doğan, Ali Aslan, Mustafa Küçükaydın

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To detect the effectiveness of pneumoreduction (PR) in intussusception, which is one the most common reasons of abdominal pain in infancy and childhood. METHODS: The records of patients treated in our clinic for intussusception between January 2005 and June 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 150 patients aged between 2 months - 12 years of age; 48% (72) were girls, 52% (78) were boys. RESULTS: The most common complaint and clinical findings were abdominal pain (94,6%), vomiting (82.6%), rectal bleeding (81.3%), and discomfort (70.9%). An abdominal mass was observed in 73.3% of patients. PR was successfully performed in 86% of patients. It was carried out once in 86% of these patients and twice in 8.1%. PR was unsuccessful in six patients and they underwent surgery. Manual reduction (31 or 67.4% of operated patients) and resection - anastomosis (15 or 32.6 % of patients) were performed by surgery. Perforation occured in two patients (1.3%) during manual reduction. CONCLUSION: PR is an effective method in the treatment of intussusception with a high success ratio and a low complication ratio. It was possible to perform the procedure especially in patients who came in the early stage of the condition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: To detect the effectiveness of pneumoreduction (PR) in intussusception, which is one the most common reasons of abdominal pain in infancy and childhood. METHODS: The records of patients treated in our clinic for intussusception between January 2005 and June 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 150 patients aged between 2 months - 12 years of age; 48% (72) were girls, 52% (78) were boys. RESULTS: The most common complaint and clinical findings were abdominal pain (94,6%), vomiting (82.6%), rectal bleeding (81.3%), and discomfort (70.9%). An abdominal mass was observed in 73.3% of patients. PR was successfully performed in 86% of patients. It was carried out once in 86% of these patients and twice in 8.1%. PR was unsuccessful in six patients and they underwent surgery. Manual reduction (31 or 67.4% of operated patients) and resection - anastomosis (15 or 32.6 % of patients) were performed by surgery. Perforation occured in two patients (1.3%) during manual reduction. CONCLUSION: PR is an effective method in the treatment of intussusception with a high success ratio and a low complication ratio. It was possible to perform the procedure especially in patients who came in the early stage of the condition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: To detect the effectiveness of pneumoreduction (PR) in intussusception, which is one the most common reasons of abdominal pain in infancy and childhood. METHODS: The records of patients treated in our clinic for intussusception between January 2005 and June 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. There were 150 patients aged between 2 months - 12 years of age; 48% (72) were girls, 52% (78) were boys. RESULTS: The most common complaint and clinical findings were abdominal pain (94,6%), vomiting (82.6%), rectal bleeding (81.3%), and discomfort (70.9%). An abdominal mass was observed in 73.3% of patients. PR was successfully performed in 86% of patients. It was carried out once in 86% of these patients and twice in 8.1%. PR was unsuccessful in six patients and they underwent surgery. Manual reduction (31 or 67.4% of operated patients) and resection - anastomosis (15 or 32.6 % of patients) were performed by surgery. Perforation occured in two patients (1.3%) during manual reduction. CONCLUSION: PR is an effective method in the treatment of intussusception with a high success ratio and a low complication ratio. It was possible to perform the procedure especially in patients who came in the early stage of the condition.

Key concepts: Medicine, Intussusception (medical disorder), Surgery, Vomiting, Abdominal pain, Perforation, Anastomosis, Complication

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effectiveness of pneumoreduction for intussusception. — Research Paper | ScholarLens