Can self-affirmation and implementation intentions be combined to reduce binge drinking in university students?
Paul E Norman, A. Wrona
Abstract
Paul E Norman, A. Wrona
Abstract
Background. Self-affirmation decreases defensive processing of health messages, whereas implementation intentions help people translate positive intentions into behaviour. Combined, they have the potential to reduce binge drinking intentions and behaviour. Methods: UK university students (N=348) reported their typical weekly alcohol use and were randomly assigned to condition in a 2 (self-affirmation) × 2 (implementation intention) between-participants factorial design. All participants read a summary about the health risks of binge drinking. Measures were taken of message derogation, perceived risk, intention and planning. Binge drinking was assessed at one-week follow-up. Findings. Self-affirmed (vs. non-affirmed) participants reported making clearer plans to avoid drinking. No other significant self-affirmation main effects were found. Participants who formed implementation intentions (vs. not) reported drinking fewer units of alcohol and engaging in binge drinking less frequently at one-week follow-up. None of the self-affirmation × implementation intention interactions were significant. Discussion. The present study provides additional evidence for the positive effects of implementation intentions, but only weak evidence for using self-affirmation, to reduce alcohol use in university students.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Background. Self-affirmation decreases defensive processing of health messages, whereas implementation intentions help people translate positive intentions into behaviour. Combined, they have the potential to reduce binge drinking intentions and behaviour. Methods: UK university students (N=348) reported their typical weekly alcohol use and were randomly assigned to condition in a 2 (self-affirmation) × 2 (implementation intention) between-participants factorial design. All participants read a summary about the health risks of binge drinking. Measures were taken of message derogation, perceived risk, intention and planning. Binge drinking was assessed at one-week follow-up. Findings. Self-affirmed (vs. non-affirmed) participants reported making clearer plans to avoid drinking. No other significant self-affirmation main effects were found. Participants who formed implementation intentions (vs. not) reported drinking fewer units of alcohol and engaging in binge drinking less frequently at one-week follow-up. None of the self-affirmation × implementation intention interactions were significant. Discussion. The present study provides additional evidence for the positive effects of implementation intentions, but only weak evidence for using self-affirmation, to reduce alcohol use in university students.
Key concepts: Binge drinking, Self-affirmation, Derogation, Psychology, Social psychology, Human factors and ergonomics, Clinical psychology, Poison control