2009•Ancient NarrativeOpen access

Philosophical Framing: The Phaedran Setting of Leucippe and Cleitophon

Karen ní Mheallaigh

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

This paper explores Plato's Phaedrus as a literary and philosophical intertext in the preamble of Achilles Tatius' Leucippe and Cleitophon . The novel's Phaedran frame playfully but programmatically foregrounds the tension between the fictive orality and textuality in this disjunctive work, and stimulates the reader's reflection on metaliterary issues, such as how to read fiction. The Phaedran play with the presence of writing, the absence of an authorial figure, and the question of how to read fiction, mark the novel's affinity with the modern category of Metafiction, and find parallels in contemporary fiction, such as the works of Lucian and Apuleius. Karen Ni Mheallaigh is Lecturer in Classics at the University of Exeter. Her research focuses on ancient fiction, especially the works of Lucian, and the novel. She has published on Lucian and on pseudo-documentary fiction in antiquity, and is currently working on a monograph on Lucian and Metafiction, which is based on her doctoral research.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper explores Plato's Phaedrus as a literary and philosophical intertext in the preamble of Achilles Tatius' Leucippe and Cleitophon . The novel's Phaedran frame playfully but programmatically foregrounds the tension between the fictive orality and textuality in this disjunctive work, and stimulates the reader's reflection on metaliterary issues, such as how to read fiction. The Phaedran play with the presence of writing, the absence of an authorial figure, and the question of how to read fiction, mark the novel's affinity with the modern category of Metafiction, and find parallels in contemporary fiction, such as the works of Lucian and Apuleius. Karen Ni Mheallaigh is Lecturer in Classics at the University of Exeter. Her research focuses on ancient fiction, especially the works of Lucian, and the novel. She has published on Lucian and on pseudo-documentary fiction in antiquity, and is currently working on a monograph on Lucian and Metafiction, which is based on her doctoral research.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper explores Plato's Phaedrus as a literary and philosophical intertext in the preamble of Achilles Tatius' Leucippe and Cleitophon . The novel's Phaedran frame playfully but programmatically foregrounds the tension between the fictive orality and textuality in this disjunctive work, and stimulates the reader's reflection on metaliterary issues, such as how to read fiction. The Phaedran play with the presence of writing, the absence of an authorial figure, and the question of how to read fiction, mark the novel's affinity with the modern category of Metafiction, and find parallels in contemporary fiction, such as the works of Lucian and Apuleius. Karen Ni Mheallaigh is Lecturer in Classics at the University of Exeter. Her research focuses on ancient fiction, especially the works of Lucian, and the novel. She has published on Lucian and on pseudo-documentary fiction in antiquity, and is currently working on a monograph on Lucian and Metafiction, which is based on her doctoral research.

Key concepts: Metafiction, Textuality, Literature, Intertextuality, Orality, Parallels, Narrative, Exegesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Philosophical Framing: The Phaedran Setting of Leucippe and Cleitophon — Research Paper | ScholarLens