1983OtolaryngologyRequires access

Transtympanic Eustachian Tuboplasty and Tolerance of Stenting Materials

James L. Parkin, Leland P. Johnson, James C. Stringham

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate various eustachian tube stenting materials in an attempt to develop a successful transtympanic eustachian tuboplasty technique. Eustachian tube mucosa was removed transtympanically in 40 feline ears. Ten ears were used as controls. Polyethylene, Silastic, and polyurethane stents were placed in 30 ears, 10 ears with each material. The ears were evaluated after a minimum of 8 weeks and the stents were removed. Eight weeks after stent removal the ears were assessed visually, tympanometrically, and by biopsies of the osseous eustachian tube mucosa. Inadequate middle ear ventilation as evidenced by persistent otitis media, persistent tympanic membrane perforations, or type B or type C tympanograms was found in 60% of control, 30% of Silastic-stented, 60% of polyurethane-stented, and 0% of polyethylene-stented ears. Small polyethylene stents were most successful in reestablishing eustachian tube function in this experiment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study was to evaluate various eustachian tube stenting materials in an attempt to develop a successful transtympanic eustachian tuboplasty technique. Eustachian tube mucosa was removed transtympanically in 40 feline ears. Ten ears were used as controls. Polyethylene, Silastic, and polyurethane stents were placed in 30 ears, 10 ears with each material. The ears were evaluated after a minimum of 8 weeks and the stents were removed. Eight weeks after stent removal the ears were assessed visually, tympanometrically, and by biopsies of the osseous eustachian tube mucosa. Inadequate middle ear ventilation as evidenced by persistent otitis media, persistent tympanic membrane perforations, or type B or type C tympanograms was found in 60% of control, 30% of Silastic-stented, 60% of polyurethane-stented, and 0% of polyethylene-stented ears. Small polyethylene stents were most successful in reestablishing eustachian tube function in this experiment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate various eustachian tube stenting materials in an attempt to develop a successful transtympanic eustachian tuboplasty technique. Eustachian tube mucosa was removed transtympanically in 40 feline ears. Ten ears were used as controls. Polyethylene, Silastic, and polyurethane stents were placed in 30 ears, 10 ears with each material. The ears were evaluated after a minimum of 8 weeks and the stents were removed. Eight weeks after stent removal the ears were assessed visually, tympanometrically, and by biopsies of the osseous eustachian tube mucosa. Inadequate middle ear ventilation as evidenced by persistent otitis media, persistent tympanic membrane perforations, or type B or type C tympanograms was found in 60% of control, 30% of Silastic-stented, 60% of polyurethane-stented, and 0% of polyethylene-stented ears. Small polyethylene stents were most successful in reestablishing eustachian tube function in this experiment.

Key concepts: Silastic, Medicine, Eustachian tube, Middle ear, Surgery, Ostium, Otitis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Transtympanic Eustachian Tuboplasty and Tolerance of Stenting Materials — Research Paper | ScholarLens