Should Depreciation Be Marked Up in a Transactional Net Margin Method Context for Service Providers
Jamal Hejazi
Abstract
Jamal Hejazi
Abstract
This article analyses the position that theoretically, although not in practice, the inclusion or exclusion of depreciation in a cost base should not alter the markup in the context of the transactional net margin method. The two key reasons why depreciation should be excluded from the analysis are considered, namely because comparables often exhibit capital intensity considerably different to the tested party and there is an inherent arbitrariness in selecting the depreciation method, thereby making the depreciating figure unreliable.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article analyses the position that theoretically, although not in practice, the inclusion or exclusion of depreciation in a cost base should not alter the markup in the context of the transactional net margin method. The two key reasons why depreciation should be excluded from the analysis are considered, namely because comparables often exhibit capital intensity considerably different to the tested party and there is an inherent arbitrariness in selecting the depreciation method, thereby making the depreciating figure unreliable.
Key concepts: Depreciation (economics), Context (archaeology), Margin (machine learning), Economics, Transactional leadership, Monetary economics, Labour economics, Business