The Influence on the Performance of English Writing through Providing Error Codes or Correct Forms
Kuan-Cheng Hsieh, Changchun Li
Abstract
Kuan-Cheng Hsieh, Changchun Li
Abstract
The study aimed to explore effects of the two correction methods: error code and correct form, in the EFL writing class. 25 sophomore students from the Department of Applied Foreign Languages at Kao Yuan University were involved. They were divided into two groups according to the performance of the pretest: high achiever and low achiever. During class, students received different error feedback. At last, a One-way ANOVA with SPSS13.0 was employed to test the significant difference of paragraph writing performance with two different correction methods. Results showed that high achievers benefit better in the posttest through the error codes provided and low achievers performed better in the posttest through correct form provided. The findings of this study through a T-test also indicate that students have positive attitude toward the correction methods which can benefit the organization in writing as well as grammar.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The study aimed to explore effects of the two correction methods: error code and correct form, in the EFL writing class. 25 sophomore students from the Department of Applied Foreign Languages at Kao Yuan University were involved. They were divided into two groups according to the performance of the pretest: high achiever and low achiever. During class, students received different error feedback. At last, a One-way ANOVA with SPSS13.0 was employed to test the significant difference of paragraph writing performance with two different correction methods. Results showed that high achievers benefit better in the posttest through the error codes provided and low achievers performed better in the posttest through correct form provided. The findings of this study through a T-test also indicate that students have positive attitude toward the correction methods which can benefit the organization in writing as well as grammar.
Key concepts: Paragraph, Grammar, Mathematics education, Test (biology), Class (philosophy), Significant difference, Computer science, Error detection and correction