2010SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Do the Attacks on Peacekeepers Constitute a Violation of IHL

Tania Gicela Bolaños

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This paper raises the question whether UNAMSIL personnel could be awarded a civilian status during the armed conflict in Sierra Leone. According to the Special Court of Sierra Leone, while analysing what has been known as the RUF case, armed attacks on UNAMSIL personnel constitute a violation of international humanitarian law because of the civilian status of the Peacekeepers. This paper mainly analyses the accuracy of the qualification of UNAMSIL personnel as Peacekeepers rather than as peace enforcers is correct, given the UN-mandate and the military capacity of UNAMSIL.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper raises the question whether UNAMSIL personnel could be awarded a civilian status during the armed conflict in Sierra Leone. According to the Special Court of Sierra Leone, while analysing what has been known as the RUF case, armed attacks on UNAMSIL personnel constitute a violation of international humanitarian law because of the civilian status of the Peacekeepers. This paper mainly analyses the accuracy of the qualification of UNAMSIL personnel as Peacekeepers rather than as peace enforcers is correct, given the UN-mandate and the military capacity of UNAMSIL.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper raises the question whether UNAMSIL personnel could be awarded a civilian status during the armed conflict in Sierra Leone. According to the Special Court of Sierra Leone, while analysing what has been known as the RUF case, armed attacks on UNAMSIL personnel constitute a violation of international humanitarian law because of the civilian status of the Peacekeepers. This paper mainly analyses the accuracy of the qualification of UNAMSIL personnel as Peacekeepers rather than as peace enforcers is correct, given the UN-mandate and the military capacity of UNAMSIL.

Key concepts: Sierra leone, Peacekeeping, Mandate, Special court, International humanitarian law, Political science, Law, Criminology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Do the Attacks on Peacekeepers Constitute a Violation of IHL — Research Paper | ScholarLens