2001SarsiaRequires access

A comparison of LHPR and OPC data from vertical distribution sampling of zooplankton in a Norwegian fjord

Nicholas C. Halliday, S. H. Coombs, Carl Smith

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

Sampling was carried out using a double Longhurst-Hardy Plankton Recorder (LHPR) system (200 µm and 53 µm mesh nets) in June 1993 in Storfjorden on the west coast of Norway to describe the vertical distribution of zooplankton. The results are compared with concurrent Optical Plankton Counter (OPC) data. Zooplankton was most abundant in a superficial (0–30 m depth) layer ofwarrn (8 to 12 °C), low salinity (23 to 34) water. Included in this shallow distribution were cladocerans, which comprised 62.7 % of all zooplankton identitied in the 200 µm LHPR samples. Most of the small zooplankton taken in the 53 µm LHPR samples was distributed in the upper 50 m of the water column|abundant amongst these small organisms were adult Microsetella norvegica together with nauplii and early copepodite stages of other copepods. Both the number and biovolume of particles recorded by the OPC were consistently about 4 times higher throughout the water column than for an equivalent size range of zooplankton identified in the 200 µm LHPR samples. A comparison of particulate size frequency distributions from the OPC and the 200 µm LHPR samples suggests that this difference could be due partly to the detection of flocculants and detritus by the OPC. However, the 53 µm LHPR results indicate that there was also significant under-representation of zooplankton < 0.35 mm Equivalent Spherical Diameter (ESD) in the 200 µm LHPR samples due to extrusion through the liltering mesh.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Sampling was carried out using a double Longhurst-Hardy Plankton Recorder (LHPR) system (200 µm and 53 µm mesh nets) in June 1993 in Storfjorden on the west coast of Norway to describe the vertical distribution of zooplankton. The results are compared with concurrent Optical Plankton Counter (OPC) data. Zooplankton was most abundant in a superficial (0–30 m depth) layer ofwarrn (8 to 12 °C), low salinity (23 to 34) water. Included in this shallow distribution were cladocerans, which comprised 62.7 % of all zooplankton identitied in the 200 µm LHPR samples. Most of the small zooplankton taken in the 53 µm LHPR samples was distributed in the upper 50 m of the water column|abundant amongst these small organisms were adult Microsetella norvegica together with nauplii and early copepodite stages of other copepods. Both the number and biovolume of particles recorded by the OPC were consistently about 4 times higher throughout the water column than for an equivalent size range of zooplankton identified in the 200 µm LHPR samples. A comparison of particulate size frequency distributions from the OPC and the 200 µm LHPR samples suggests that this difference could be due partly to the detection of flocculants and detritus by the OPC. However, the 53 µm LHPR results indicate that there was also significant under-representation of zooplankton < 0.35 mm Equivalent Spherical Diameter (ESD) in the 200 µm LHPR samples due to extrusion through the liltering mesh.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Sampling was carried out using a double Longhurst-Hardy Plankton Recorder (LHPR) system (200 µm and 53 µm mesh nets) in June 1993 in Storfjorden on the west coast of Norway to describe the vertical distribution of zooplankton. The results are compared with concurrent Optical Plankton Counter (OPC) data. Zooplankton was most abundant in a superficial (0–30 m depth) layer ofwarrn (8 to 12 °C), low salinity (23 to 34) water. Included in this shallow distribution were cladocerans, which comprised 62.7 % of all zooplankton identitied in the 200 µm LHPR samples. Most of the small zooplankton taken in the 53 µm LHPR samples was distributed in the upper 50 m of the water column|abundant amongst these small organisms were adult Microsetella norvegica together with nauplii and early copepodite stages of other copepods. Both the number and biovolume of particles recorded by the OPC were consistently about 4 times higher throughout the water column than for an equivalent size range of zooplankton identified in the 200 µm LHPR samples. A comparison of particulate size frequency distributions from the OPC and the 200 µm LHPR samples suggests that this difference could be due partly to the detection of flocculants and detritus by the OPC. However, the 53 µm LHPR results indicate that there was also significant under-representation of zooplankton < 0.35 mm Equivalent Spherical Diameter (ESD) in the 200 µm LHPR samples due to extrusion through the liltering mesh.

Key concepts: Zooplankton, Water column, Plankton, Fjord, Oceanography, Thermocline, Detritus, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparison of LHPR and OPC data from vertical distribution sampling of zooplankton in a Norwegian fjord — Research Paper | ScholarLens