The Ability of the European Union to Solve the Democratic Deficit: A Historical Perspective
Lung-Tan Lu
Abstract
Lung-Tan Lu
Abstract
This report offers a historical review of European integration and analyzes the democratic-deficit agenda in the European Union. It is argued that the distinct positions among the three big Member States (i.e., the United Kingdom, France, and Germany) have a great impact on the integrative movement wherein these Member States have aspired to fight for their sovereignty. The European Parliament has been evolving from a common assembly to a supranational parliament but with limited powers. It is argued that the European Union will not be fully democratic and accountable by the enactment of a Constitution.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This report offers a historical review of European integration and analyzes the democratic-deficit agenda in the European Union. It is argued that the distinct positions among the three big Member States (i.e., the United Kingdom, France, and Germany) have a great impact on the integrative movement wherein these Member States have aspired to fight for their sovereignty. The European Parliament has been evolving from a common assembly to a supranational parliament but with limited powers. It is argued that the European Union will not be fully democratic and accountable by the enactment of a Constitution.
Key concepts: Parliament, Democratic deficit, European union, Political science, European integration, Democracy, Constitution, Sovereignty