2014HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Open access

A Dynamic Logic Framework for Abstract Argumentation

Sylvie Doutre, Andreas Herzig, Laurent Perrussel

Open full text 50 citations

Abstract

A dynamic framework, based on the Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments (DL-PA), has recently been proposed for Dung’s abstract argument system. This framework allows the addition and the removal of attacks, and the modification of the acceptance status of arguments. We here extend this framework in order to capture the addition and the removal of arguments. We then apply the framework on an access control case, where an agent engages in an argued dialogue to access some information controlled by another agent.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A dynamic framework, based on the Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments (DL-PA), has recently been proposed for Dung’s abstract argument system. This framework allows the addition and the removal of attacks, and the modification of the acceptance status of arguments. We here extend this framework in order to capture the addition and the removal of arguments. We then apply the framework on an access control case, where an agent engages in an argued dialogue to access some information controlled by another agent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A dynamic framework, based on the Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments (DL-PA), has recently been proposed for Dung’s abstract argument system. This framework allows the addition and the removal of attacks, and the modification of the acceptance status of arguments. We here extend this framework in order to capture the addition and the removal of arguments. We then apply the framework on an access control case, where an agent engages in an argued dialogue to access some information controlled by another agent.

Key concepts: Well-formed formula, Propositional variable, Argumentation theory, Propositional calculus, Propositional formula, Autoepistemic logic, Zeroth-order logic, Tautology (logic)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Dynamic Logic Framework for Abstract Argumentation — Research Paper | ScholarLens