A Dynamic Logic Framework for Abstract Argumentation
Sylvie Doutre, Andreas Herzig, Laurent Perrussel
Abstract
Sylvie Doutre, Andreas Herzig, Laurent Perrussel
Abstract
A dynamic framework, based on the Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments (DL-PA), has recently been proposed for Dung’s abstract argument system. This framework allows the addition and the removal of attacks, and the modification of the acceptance status of arguments. We here extend this framework in order to capture the addition and the removal of arguments. We then apply the framework on an access control case, where an agent engages in an argued dialogue to access some information controlled by another agent.
OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A dynamic framework, based on the Dynamic Logic of Propositional Assignments (DL-PA), has recently been proposed for Dung’s abstract argument system. This framework allows the addition and the removal of attacks, and the modification of the acceptance status of arguments. We here extend this framework in order to capture the addition and the removal of arguments. We then apply the framework on an access control case, where an agent engages in an argued dialogue to access some information controlled by another agent.
Key concepts: Well-formed formula, Propositional variable, Argumentation theory, Propositional calculus, Propositional formula, Autoepistemic logic, Zeroth-order logic, Tautology (logic)