2004Unpublished venueRequires access

Progressivity and Saving: Fixing the Nation's Upside-Down Incentives for Saving: Testimony before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce

Peter R. Orszag

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

As the baby boomer generation nears retirement, the shortcomings in the nation's upside-down system of incentives for retirement saving are becoming increasingly apparent. The existing structure is upside down for two reasons: First, it gives the strongest incentives to participate to higher-income households who least need to save more to achieve an adequate retirement living standard and who are the most likely to use pensions as a tax shelter, rather than as a vehicle to raise saving. Second, the subsidies are worth the least to households who most need to save more for retirement and who, if they do contribute, are most likely to use the accounts to raise net saving. [© Brookings Institution]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As the baby boomer generation nears retirement, the shortcomings in the nation's upside-down system of incentives for retirement saving are becoming increasingly apparent. The existing structure is upside down for two reasons: First, it gives the strongest incentives to participate to higher-income households who least need to save more to achieve an adequate retirement living standard and who are the most likely to use pensions as a tax shelter, rather than as a vehicle to raise saving. Second, the subsidies are worth the least to households who most need to save more for retirement and who, if they do contribute, are most likely to use the accounts to raise net saving. [© Brookings Institution]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As the baby boomer generation nears retirement, the shortcomings in the nation's upside-down system of incentives for retirement saving are becoming increasingly apparent. The existing structure is upside down for two reasons: First, it gives the strongest incentives to participate to higher-income households who least need to save more to achieve an adequate retirement living standard and who are the most likely to use pensions as a tax shelter, rather than as a vehicle to raise saving. Second, the subsidies are worth the least to households who most need to save more for retirement and who, if they do contribute, are most likely to use the accounts to raise net saving. [© Brookings Institution]

Key concepts: Incentive, Subsidy, Labour economics, Workforce, Baby boomers, Institution, Economics, Mandatory retirement

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Progressivity and Saving: Fixing the Nation's Upside-Down Incentives for Saving: Testimony before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce — Research Paper | ScholarLens