2016PubMedRequires access

MicroCT study on the enamel mineral density of primary molars.

M.E.C. Elfrink, Kadriye Kalin, L.J. van Ruijven, J.M. ten Cate, J. S. J. Veerkamp

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to report on the mineral density of the enamel of primary molars related to the age of the child and to compare the mineral density of sound and carious enamel in those molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 23 children and 41 extracted primary molars. The primary molars of 21 children met all of the inclusion criteria, and these were studied and scanned using microCT. The teeth were embedded in Impregum (3M ESPE) and stored in a solution of tap water with thymol crystals. Sixteen primary molars from 7 children were used to compare the mineral density in sound and carious areas, and 13 primary molars from 11 children were used for the comparison between mineral density and time in situ. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (31%) was found between the mineral density in carious enamel and sound enamel (p = 0.0006). In addition, a significant relationship was observed between the mineral density of sound enamel and the time the teeth had been in situ (r = 0.698). We also found two teeth with radiolucencies in the dentin with the enamel clinically showing only a non-cavitated carious lesion in the enamel. No significant differences were found between the mean mineral density in sound enamel surfaces and unaffected areas in surfaces of molars with enamel caries (p = 0.4373). CONCLUSION: Local and general differences in enamel mineralisation are presented. Post-eruptive maturation seems to be present not only in permanent teeth but also in primary molars. Carious enamel has significantly less mineral density than clinically sound enamel.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: The aim of this study is to report on the mineral density of the enamel of primary molars related to the age of the child and to compare the mineral density of sound and carious enamel in those molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 23 children and 41 extracted primary molars. The primary molars of 21 children met all of the inclusion criteria, and these were studied and scanned using microCT. The teeth were embedded in Impregum (3M ESPE) and stored in a solution of tap water with thymol crystals. Sixteen primary molars from 7 children were used to compare the mineral density in sound and carious areas, and 13 primary molars from 11 children were used for the comparison between mineral density and time in situ. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (31%) was found between the mineral density in carious enamel and sound enamel (p = 0.0006). In addition, a significant relationship was observed between the mineral density of sound enamel and the time the teeth had been in situ (r = 0.698). We also found two teeth with radiolucencies in the dentin with the enamel clinically showing only a non-cavitated carious lesion in the enamel. No significant differences were found between the mean mineral density in sound enamel surfaces and unaffected areas in surfaces of molars with enamel caries (p = 0.4373). CONCLUSION: Local and general differences in enamel mineralisation are presented. Post-eruptive maturation seems to be present not only in permanent teeth but also in primary molars. Carious enamel has significantly less mineral density than clinically sound enamel.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: The aim of this study is to report on the mineral density of the enamel of primary molars related to the age of the child and to compare the mineral density of sound and carious enamel in those molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 23 children and 41 extracted primary molars. The primary molars of 21 children met all of the inclusion criteria, and these were studied and scanned using microCT. The teeth were embedded in Impregum (3M ESPE) and stored in a solution of tap water with thymol crystals. Sixteen primary molars from 7 children were used to compare the mineral density in sound and carious areas, and 13 primary molars from 11 children were used for the comparison between mineral density and time in situ. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference (31%) was found between the mineral density in carious enamel and sound enamel (p = 0.0006). In addition, a significant relationship was observed between the mineral density of sound enamel and the time the teeth had been in situ (r = 0.698). We also found two teeth with radiolucencies in the dentin with the enamel clinically showing only a non-cavitated carious lesion in the enamel. No significant differences were found between the mean mineral density in sound enamel surfaces and unaffected areas in surfaces of molars with enamel caries (p = 0.4373). CONCLUSION: Local and general differences in enamel mineralisation are presented. Post-eruptive maturation seems to be present not only in permanent teeth but also in primary molars. Carious enamel has significantly less mineral density than clinically sound enamel.

Key concepts: Enamel paint, Molar, Dentistry, Dentin, Orthodontics, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
MicroCT study on the enamel mineral density of primary molars. — Research Paper | ScholarLens