2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

國際政治經濟學三大研究途徑-經濟民族主義、經濟自由主義與馬克思主義-之比較分析

曾怡仁

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Since 1970s the development of International Political Economy (IPE) has caused some debates about the essence of this new discipline. In general, the research of IPE is to combine the work of International Relations with Political Economy, and to investigate interactions between international politics and international economy, international politics and domestic economy, and international economy and domestic politics. Basically, there are three major perspectives-Economic Nationalism, Economic Liberalism, and Marxism-on studying these interactions. The main purpose of this article is to compare how different perspective has absorbed concept or research method from International Relations or Political Economy respectively. Through this comparative study we may distinguish differences or similarities among the IPE, International Relations, and Political Economy. In the end of this study, the author suggests that the theory of state may help us better understanding on the International Political Economy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since 1970s the development of International Political Economy (IPE) has caused some debates about the essence of this new discipline. In general, the research of IPE is to combine the work of International Relations with Political Economy, and to investigate interactions between international politics and international economy, international politics and domestic economy, and international economy and domestic politics. Basically, there are three major perspectives-Economic Nationalism, Economic Liberalism, and Marxism-on studying these interactions. The main purpose of this article is to compare how different perspective has absorbed concept or research method from International Relations or Political Economy respectively. Through this comparative study we may distinguish differences or similarities among the IPE, International Relations, and Political Economy. In the end of this study, the author suggests that the theory of state may help us better understanding on the International Political Economy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since 1970s the development of International Political Economy (IPE) has caused some debates about the essence of this new discipline. In general, the research of IPE is to combine the work of International Relations with Political Economy, and to investigate interactions between international politics and international economy, international politics and domestic economy, and international economy and domestic politics. Basically, there are three major perspectives-Economic Nationalism, Economic Liberalism, and Marxism-on studying these interactions. The main purpose of this article is to compare how different perspective has absorbed concept or research method from International Relations or Political Economy respectively. Through this comparative study we may distinguish differences or similarities among the IPE, International Relations, and Political Economy. In the end of this study, the author suggests that the theory of state may help us better understanding on the International Political Economy.

Key concepts: International political economy, International relations, Post-realism, International relations theory, Politics, Political science, Global politics, Economic liberalism

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
國際政治經濟學三大研究途徑-經濟民族主義、經濟自由主義與馬克思主義-之比較分析 — Research Paper | ScholarLens