1994•Physiological ZoologyRequires access

Partitioning of Nitrogen Excretion between Urea and Ammonia and between Skin and Kidneys in the Aquatic CaecilianTyphlonectes natans

Daniel F. Stiffler, Thammasack Manokham

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Nitrogen excretion was studied in the aquatic caecilian Typhlonectes natans by analyzing samples of the bathing medium over an 8-h period for total ammonia (Tamm: NH₃ + \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{wasysym} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document}$${\mathrm{NH_{4}^{+}}}$$\end{document}) and urea. Total ammonia was excreted at a rate of 0.35 μM · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, while urea was excreted at a rate of 0.19 μM · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹. When excretion is expressed in molar equivalents of nitrogen, ammonia-N excretion was 0.35 μatm N · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹ while urea-N excretion was 0.38 μatm N · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹. These latter values uwere not significantly different. Plasma Tamm concentration was 1.3 mM, while plasma urea concentration was 4.4 mM. Urine Tamm concentration was 3.8 mM, while urine urea concentration was 2.7 mM. Partitioning Tamm excretion between skin and kidneys found 1.11 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹ ammonia excreted across the skin. The kidneys contributed 0.09 μM · 10 g⁻¹ h⁻¹, or less than 8%. Skin urea excretion rate was 0.21 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, while the kidneys accounted for 0.08 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, or less than 28%.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Nitrogen excretion was studied in the aquatic caecilian Typhlonectes natans by analyzing samples of the bathing medium over an 8-h period for total ammonia (Tamm: NH₃ + \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{wasysym} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document}$${\mathrm{NH_{4}^{+}}}$$\end{document}) and urea. Total ammonia was excreted at a rate of 0.35 μM · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, while urea was excreted at a rate of 0.19 μM · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹. When excretion is expressed in molar equivalents of nitrogen, ammonia-N excretion was 0.35 μatm N · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹ while urea-N excretion was 0.38 μatm N · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹. These latter values uwere not significantly different. Plasma Tamm concentration was 1.3 mM, while plasma urea concentration was 4.4 mM. Urine Tamm concentration was 3.8 mM, while urine urea concentration was 2.7 mM. Partitioning Tamm excretion between skin and kidneys found 1.11 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹ ammonia excreted across the skin. The kidneys contributed 0.09 μM · 10 g⁻¹ h⁻¹, or less than 8%. Skin urea excretion rate was 0.21 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, while the kidneys accounted for 0.08 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, or less than 28%.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Nitrogen excretion was studied in the aquatic caecilian Typhlonectes natans by analyzing samples of the bathing medium over an 8-h period for total ammonia (Tamm: NH₃ + \documentclass{aastex} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{bm} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{pifont} \usepackage{stmaryrd} \usepackage{textcomp} \usepackage{portland,xspace} \usepackage{amsmath,amsxtra} \usepackage{wasysym} \pagestyle{empty} \DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6} \begin{document}$${\mathrm{NH_{4}^{+}}}$$\end{document}) and urea. Total ammonia was excreted at a rate of 0.35 μM · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, while urea was excreted at a rate of 0.19 μM · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹. When excretion is expressed in molar equivalents of nitrogen, ammonia-N excretion was 0.35 μatm N · 10g⁻¹ · h⁻¹ while urea-N excretion was 0.38 μatm N · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹. These latter values uwere not significantly different. Plasma Tamm concentration was 1.3 mM, while plasma urea concentration was 4.4 mM. Urine Tamm concentration was 3.8 mM, while urine urea concentration was 2.7 mM. Partitioning Tamm excretion between skin and kidneys found 1.11 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹ ammonia excreted across the skin. The kidneys contributed 0.09 μM · 10 g⁻¹ h⁻¹, or less than 8%. Skin urea excretion rate was 0.21 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, while the kidneys accounted for 0.08 μM · 10 g⁻¹ · h⁻¹, or less than 28%.

Key concepts: Excretion, Urea, Ammonia, Chemistry, Urine, Nitrogen, Animal science, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Partitioning of Nitrogen Excretion between Urea and Ammonia and between Skin and Kidneys in the Aquatic CaecilianTyphlonectes natans — Research Paper | ScholarLens