2009The FASEB JournalRequires access

The incorporation of a protein‐rich breakfast on appetite sensations and subsequent food intake in “breakfast‐skipping” adolescents

Heather J. Leidy, Erin Marie Racki, Candice R Coffey

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Purpose To examine the impact of a protein‐rich breakfast (in solid vs. beverage form) on appetite and subsequent food intake in breakfast‐skipping adolescents. Methods: 15 healthy adolescents (age 14 ± 1 y; BMI 79 ± 4 %ile; breakfast 2 ± 1 occasions/wk) randomly consumed, on 4 separate days, a 500 kcal breakfast consisting of a normal protein meal (18 ± 1 g protein) in solid form (PN‐S), a protein‐rich meal (48 ± 2 g protein) in solid (PR‐S) or beverage (PR‐B) form, or no meal (NM). Pre and post‐meal appetite was measured over 5 h followed by an ad libitum lunch. Results PR‐S was the only meal to exhibit significant reductions in post‐meal hunger vs. NM (p<0.01). Post‐meal fullness was greater after each meal vs. NM (all comparisons; p<0.05) but not different between meals. All meals led to significant reductions in prospective food consumption vs. NM (all comparisons; p<0.05); PR‐S led to greater reductions vs. PN‐S (p=0.06). Fewer calories were consumed at lunch following the PR‐S (363 ± 51) vs. NM (490 ± 63; p< 0.01), PN‐S (504 ± 66; p<0.01), and PR‐B (464 ± 83 kcal; p=0.10). Conclusions The incorporation of a protein‐rich breakfast beneficially impacts appetite & subsequent food intake in breakfast‐skipping adolescents suggesting a potential role in the management of obesity. However, protein‐rich beverages may not elicit the same positive effects compared to solid versions. Support: M01 RR023940; SAH Research Award, KUMC

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose To examine the impact of a protein‐rich breakfast (in solid vs. beverage form) on appetite and subsequent food intake in breakfast‐skipping adolescents. Methods: 15 healthy adolescents (age 14 ± 1 y; BMI 79 ± 4 %ile; breakfast 2 ± 1 occasions/wk) randomly consumed, on 4 separate days, a 500 kcal breakfast consisting of a normal protein meal (18 ± 1 g protein) in solid form (PN‐S), a protein‐rich meal (48 ± 2 g protein) in solid (PR‐S) or beverage (PR‐B) form, or no meal (NM). Pre and post‐meal appetite was measured over 5 h followed by an ad libitum lunch. Results PR‐S was the only meal to exhibit significant reductions in post‐meal hunger vs. NM (p<0.01). Post‐meal fullness was greater after each meal vs. NM (all comparisons; p<0.05) but not different between meals. All meals led to significant reductions in prospective food consumption vs. NM (all comparisons; p<0.05); PR‐S led to greater reductions vs. PN‐S (p=0.06). Fewer calories were consumed at lunch following the PR‐S (363 ± 51) vs. NM (490 ± 63; p< 0.01), PN‐S (504 ± 66; p<0.01), and PR‐B (464 ± 83 kcal; p=0.10). Conclusions The incorporation of a protein‐rich breakfast beneficially impacts appetite & subsequent food intake in breakfast‐skipping adolescents suggesting a potential role in the management of obesity. However, protein‐rich beverages may not elicit the same positive effects compared to solid versions. Support: M01 RR023940; SAH Research Award, KUMC

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose To examine the impact of a protein‐rich breakfast (in solid vs. beverage form) on appetite and subsequent food intake in breakfast‐skipping adolescents. Methods: 15 healthy adolescents (age 14 ± 1 y; BMI 79 ± 4 %ile; breakfast 2 ± 1 occasions/wk) randomly consumed, on 4 separate days, a 500 kcal breakfast consisting of a normal protein meal (18 ± 1 g protein) in solid form (PN‐S), a protein‐rich meal (48 ± 2 g protein) in solid (PR‐S) or beverage (PR‐B) form, or no meal (NM). Pre and post‐meal appetite was measured over 5 h followed by an ad libitum lunch. Results PR‐S was the only meal to exhibit significant reductions in post‐meal hunger vs. NM (p<0.01). Post‐meal fullness was greater after each meal vs. NM (all comparisons; p<0.05) but not different between meals. All meals led to significant reductions in prospective food consumption vs. NM (all comparisons; p<0.05); PR‐S led to greater reductions vs. PN‐S (p=0.06). Fewer calories were consumed at lunch following the PR‐S (363 ± 51) vs. NM (490 ± 63; p< 0.01), PN‐S (504 ± 66; p<0.01), and PR‐B (464 ± 83 kcal; p=0.10). Conclusions The incorporation of a protein‐rich breakfast beneficially impacts appetite & subsequent food intake in breakfast‐skipping adolescents suggesting a potential role in the management of obesity. However, protein‐rich beverages may not elicit the same positive effects compared to solid versions. Support: M01 RR023940; SAH Research Award, KUMC

Key concepts: Meal, Appetite, Calorie, Food science, Medicine, Food intake, Obesity, Animal science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The incorporation of a protein‐rich breakfast on appetite sensations and subsequent food intake in “breakfast‐skipping” adolescents — Research Paper | ScholarLens