1957Journal of Animal ScienceRequires access

Selective Grazing by Sheep and Cattle

James H. Meyer, G. P. Lofgreen, J. L. Hull

Open publisher page 41 citations

Abstract

Studies were made of differences in ability of sheep and cattle to graze selectively alfalfa and trefoil-orchard grass forage. Criteria used to assess the importance of selective grazing were digestibility, forage consumption, total digestible nutrient consumption, weight gains, yields of dry matter and yields of total digestible nutrients. Differences between sheep and cattle were apparent when given alfalfa forage. The sheep selected and consumed from the alfalfa pasture a forage higher in total digestible nutrients and made more gain per unit of total digestible nutrients consumed than did the steers. With the trefoil-orchard grass, however, difference between sheep and cattle in ability to select were not as apparent. It appears that with a low dense forage selective grazing will not have as great an influence as it has with a tall, less dense forage. The steers made better use of the alfalfa soilage because they consumed more feed. The sheep were unable to select the forage desired and this seemed to interfere with feed consumption and hence production. Selective grazing which resulted in refusals to eat the coarse alfalfa stems combined with higher total digestible nutrient content of trefoil-orchard grass forage decreased the importance of differences in dry matter yield between alfalfa and trefoil-orchard grass forage. Even though trefoil-orchard grass produced 58 to 63% the amount of dry matter produced by alfalfa, the ultimate yield in terms of beef and lamb produced per acre showed that trefoil-orchard grass yielded 80 and 89% respectively the yield from alfalfa.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Studies were made of differences in ability of sheep and cattle to graze selectively alfalfa and trefoil-orchard grass forage. Criteria used to assess the importance of selective grazing were digestibility, forage consumption, total digestible nutrient consumption, weight gains, yields of dry matter and yields of total digestible nutrients. Differences between sheep and cattle were apparent when given alfalfa forage. The sheep selected and consumed from the alfalfa pasture a forage higher in total digestible nutrients and made more gain per unit of total digestible nutrients consumed than did the steers. With the trefoil-orchard grass, however, difference between sheep and cattle in ability to select were not as apparent. It appears that with a low dense forage selective grazing will not have as great an influence as it has with a tall, less dense forage. The steers made better use of the alfalfa soilage because they consumed more feed. The sheep were unable to select the forage desired and this seemed to interfere with feed consumption and hence production. Selective grazing which resulted in refusals to eat the coarse alfalfa stems combined with higher total digestible nutrient content of trefoil-orchard grass forage decreased the importance of differences in dry matter yield between alfalfa and trefoil-orchard grass forage. Even though trefoil-orchard grass produced 58 to 63% the amount of dry matter produced by alfalfa, the ultimate yield in terms of beef and lamb produced per acre showed that trefoil-orchard grass yielded 80 and 89% respectively the yield from alfalfa.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 41 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Studies were made of differences in ability of sheep and cattle to graze selectively alfalfa and trefoil-orchard grass forage. Criteria used to assess the importance of selective grazing were digestibility, forage consumption, total digestible nutrient consumption, weight gains, yields of dry matter and yields of total digestible nutrients. Differences between sheep and cattle were apparent when given alfalfa forage. The sheep selected and consumed from the alfalfa pasture a forage higher in total digestible nutrients and made more gain per unit of total digestible nutrients consumed than did the steers. With the trefoil-orchard grass, however, difference between sheep and cattle in ability to select were not as apparent. It appears that with a low dense forage selective grazing will not have as great an influence as it has with a tall, less dense forage. The steers made better use of the alfalfa soilage because they consumed more feed. The sheep were unable to select the forage desired and this seemed to interfere with feed consumption and hence production. Selective grazing which resulted in refusals to eat the coarse alfalfa stems combined with higher total digestible nutrient content of trefoil-orchard grass forage decreased the importance of differences in dry matter yield between alfalfa and trefoil-orchard grass forage. Even though trefoil-orchard grass produced 58 to 63% the amount of dry matter produced by alfalfa, the ultimate yield in terms of beef and lamb produced per acre showed that trefoil-orchard grass yielded 80 and 89% respectively the yield from alfalfa.

Key concepts: Forage, Grazing, Agronomy, Dry matter, Orchard, Pasture, Biology, Trefoil

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Selective Grazing by Sheep and Cattle — Research Paper | ScholarLens