2015•Unpublished venueRequires access

Is Habermas on Twitter?

Axel Bruns, Tim Highfield

Open publisher page 106 citations

Abstract

This chapter explores the extent to which such filter bubbles can persist, by examining the structural characteristics of an entire national Twittersphere. Indeed, Jurgen Habermas himself suggests that as "a larger number of people tend to take an interest in a larger number of issues, the overlap of issue publics may even serve to counter trends of fragmentation". The transformation from public sphere to public spheres—and the spread of political and public debate across multiple actors, platforms, and publics—remains an ongoing process. Hashtags have been shown to be crucial to Twitter&s;s response especially to breaking news events, but also enable users to come together around common topics of interest or to engage in shared audience activities. In many ways, issue publics may really be best described as issue communities, and are most likely to gather in the spaces provided by online community platforms—including, centrally, social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explores the extent to which such filter bubbles can persist, by examining the structural characteristics of an entire national Twittersphere. Indeed, Jurgen Habermas himself suggests that as "a larger number of people tend to take an interest in a larger number of issues, the overlap of issue publics may even serve to counter trends of fragmentation". The transformation from public sphere to public spheres—and the spread of political and public debate across multiple actors, platforms, and publics—remains an ongoing process. Hashtags have been shown to be crucial to Twitter&s;s response especially to breaking news events, but also enable users to come together around common topics of interest or to engage in shared audience activities. In many ways, issue publics may really be best described as issue communities, and are most likely to gather in the spaces provided by online community platforms—including, centrally, social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 106 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explores the extent to which such filter bubbles can persist, by examining the structural characteristics of an entire national Twittersphere. Indeed, Jurgen Habermas himself suggests that as "a larger number of people tend to take an interest in a larger number of issues, the overlap of issue publics may even serve to counter trends of fragmentation". The transformation from public sphere to public spheres—and the spread of political and public debate across multiple actors, platforms, and publics—remains an ongoing process. Hashtags have been shown to be crucial to Twitter&s;s response especially to breaking news events, but also enable users to come together around common topics of interest or to engage in shared audience activities. In many ways, issue publics may really be best described as issue communities, and are most likely to gather in the spaces provided by online community platforms—including, centrally, social media sites, such as Facebook and Twitter.

Key concepts: Social media, Sociology, Psychology, Epistemology, Computer science, Philosophy, World Wide Web

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Is Habermas on Twitter? — Research Paper | ScholarLens