David Cameron and welfare: a change of rhetoric should not be mistaken for a change of ideology
Libby McEnhill
Abstract
Open-access reader
Libby McEnhill
Abstract
Open-access reader
Libby McEnhill argues that it is wrong to see Cameron’s ’One Nation’ Conservatism and Thatcherite Conservatism as though they represent opposites in their approaches to welfare and the role and responsibilities of the state. In essence, both see danger in an expanded state and share the same ideological foundations.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Libby McEnhill argues that it is wrong to see Cameron’s ’One Nation’ Conservatism and Thatcherite Conservatism as though they represent opposites in their approaches to welfare and the role and responsibilities of the state. In essence, both see danger in an expanded state and share the same ideological foundations.
Key concepts: Ideology, Thatcherism, Conservatism, Rhetoric, Welfare state, State (computer science), Law and economics, Political science