Relationship between Two FCA Approaches on Heterogeneous Formal Contexts.
Ondrej Kr, Bohuslav Macek, Lenka Pisková, Pavol Jozef
Abstract
Ondrej Kr, Bohuslav Macek, Lenka Pisková, Pavol Jozef
Abstract
We show a relationship between two theoretical approaches of Formal Concept Analysis working with so-called heterogeneous formal context i.e. such context in which each object and attribute can have own data-type. One of them is presented in (19); each value in a formal context is some Galois connection between the lattices corresponding to the appropriate object and attribute. Another approach is presented in our paper (1) and it is a unifying platform of approaches from (14) and (11), (12). In this paper, we prove that each of them can be derived from another.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We show a relationship between two theoretical approaches of Formal Concept Analysis working with so-called heterogeneous formal context i.e. such context in which each object and attribute can have own data-type. One of them is presented in (19); each value in a formal context is some Galois connection between the lattices corresponding to the appropriate object and attribute. Another approach is presented in our paper (1) and it is a unifying platform of approaches from (14) and (11), (12). In this paper, we prove that each of them can be derived from another.
Key concepts: Formal concept analysis, Galois connection, Context (archaeology), Computer science, Lattice Miner, Object (grammar), Formal description, Formal methods