2012Indian Journal of EntomologyRequires access

Efficacy of plant powders and vegetable oils against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) on stored green gram

Pankaj Neog, H. K. Singh

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Ten different plants powders viz., leaf and seed coat of Zanthoxylum oxyphyllum Edgw.; seed of Litsea citrata Bl.; leaf, seed coat and kernel of Azadirachta indica A. Juss.; leaf, seed coat and kernel of Melia azedarach L. and seed of Piper nigrum L. @ 5% w/w and eight vegetable oils viz., neem, castor, clove, mustard, sunflower, sesamum, coconut and groundnut oil @ 1% v/w were evaluated as grain protectants against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) on green gram seeds. All the vegetable oils and A. indica kernel powder provided maximum protection up to 2 months resulting in 2.22 to 9.11% infestation and 1.13 to 5.10% weight loss only as against 56.67 to 61.33% and 30.77 to 32.60% in untreated seeds. P. nigrum and L. citrata were fairly effective in reducing infestation and weight loss by about 60% as compared to untreated seeds up to 2 months, while Z. oxyphyllum was the least effective followed by M. azedarach. None of the plant materials adversely affected the seed germinability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Ten different plants powders viz., leaf and seed coat of Zanthoxylum oxyphyllum Edgw.; seed of Litsea citrata Bl.; leaf, seed coat and kernel of Azadirachta indica A. Juss.; leaf, seed coat and kernel of Melia azedarach L. and seed of Piper nigrum L. @ 5% w/w and eight vegetable oils viz., neem, castor, clove, mustard, sunflower, sesamum, coconut and groundnut oil @ 1% v/w were evaluated as grain protectants against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) on green gram seeds. All the vegetable oils and A. indica kernel powder provided maximum protection up to 2 months resulting in 2.22 to 9.11% infestation and 1.13 to 5.10% weight loss only as against 56.67 to 61.33% and 30.77 to 32.60% in untreated seeds. P. nigrum and L. citrata were fairly effective in reducing infestation and weight loss by about 60% as compared to untreated seeds up to 2 months, while Z. oxyphyllum was the least effective followed by M. azedarach. None of the plant materials adversely affected the seed germinability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Ten different plants powders viz., leaf and seed coat of Zanthoxylum oxyphyllum Edgw.; seed of Litsea citrata Bl.; leaf, seed coat and kernel of Azadirachta indica A. Juss.; leaf, seed coat and kernel of Melia azedarach L. and seed of Piper nigrum L. @ 5% w/w and eight vegetable oils viz., neem, castor, clove, mustard, sunflower, sesamum, coconut and groundnut oil @ 1% v/w were evaluated as grain protectants against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) on green gram seeds. All the vegetable oils and A. indica kernel powder provided maximum protection up to 2 months resulting in 2.22 to 9.11% infestation and 1.13 to 5.10% weight loss only as against 56.67 to 61.33% and 30.77 to 32.60% in untreated seeds. P. nigrum and L. citrata were fairly effective in reducing infestation and weight loss by about 60% as compared to untreated seeds up to 2 months, while Z. oxyphyllum was the least effective followed by M. azedarach. None of the plant materials adversely affected the seed germinability.

Key concepts: Melia azedarach, Azadirachta, Sesamum, Callosobruchus chinensis, Biology, Horticulture, Piper, Coat

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of plant powders and vegetable oils against Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) on stored green gram — Research Paper | ScholarLens