2015International journal of medical and health sciencesRequires access

Hemodynamic Responses to Microlaryngoscopy in ENT Patients -A Comparative Study of Premedication with Oral Clonidine and Metoprolol

Sunitha K. Zachariah, Sara Ninan

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Attenuation of the hemodynamic responses to microlaryngoscopy in ENT patients is achieved using various drugs. Premedication with clonidine and metoprolol produce stable hemodynamics and a reduction in the amount of anaesthetic required. Materials and Methods : This is a prospective randomized double-blind study conducted to compare the effects of two such drugs clonidine and metoprolol given as oral premedication. Forty patients were premedicated 90 minutes prior to the procedure with oral clonidine and placebo in one group and metoprolol and diazepam in the other group and were anaesthetised using a standardised anaesthetic technique. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures were recorded and the changes from baseline to those values during and after scopy were compared. The time interval from reversal to extubation and the sedation score at the end of the surgery were also noted. The statistical analysis of the data was done using student’s T-test. Results : The mean of the differences in heart rate from baseline value to scopy at 5 minutes was 13.6 ± 11.26 for clonidine and 12.05 ± 9.42 for metoprolol P=0.64 and that of mean blood pressure was 16.5 ± 8.75 and 13.45±9.69 P=0.30. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the attenuation of cardiovascular response. The sedation produced by clonidine was comparable with that of diazepam. Conclusion: Both clonidine and metoprolol were equally effective in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to the procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Introduction: Attenuation of the hemodynamic responses to microlaryngoscopy in ENT patients is achieved using various drugs. Premedication with clonidine and metoprolol produce stable hemodynamics and a reduction in the amount of anaesthetic required. Materials and Methods : This is a prospective randomized double-blind study conducted to compare the effects of two such drugs clonidine and metoprolol given as oral premedication. Forty patients were premedicated 90 minutes prior to the procedure with oral clonidine and placebo in one group and metoprolol and diazepam in the other group and were anaesthetised using a standardised anaesthetic technique. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures were recorded and the changes from baseline to those values during and after scopy were compared. The time interval from reversal to extubation and the sedation score at the end of the surgery were also noted. The statistical analysis of the data was done using student’s T-test. Results : The mean of the differences in heart rate from baseline value to scopy at 5 minutes was 13.6 ± 11.26 for clonidine and 12.05 ± 9.42 for metoprolol P=0.64 and that of mean blood pressure was 16.5 ± 8.75 and 13.45±9.69 P=0.30. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the attenuation of cardiovascular response. The sedation produced by clonidine was comparable with that of diazepam. Conclusion: Both clonidine and metoprolol were equally effective in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to the procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Introduction: Attenuation of the hemodynamic responses to microlaryngoscopy in ENT patients is achieved using various drugs. Premedication with clonidine and metoprolol produce stable hemodynamics and a reduction in the amount of anaesthetic required. Materials and Methods : This is a prospective randomized double-blind study conducted to compare the effects of two such drugs clonidine and metoprolol given as oral premedication. Forty patients were premedicated 90 minutes prior to the procedure with oral clonidine and placebo in one group and metoprolol and diazepam in the other group and were anaesthetised using a standardised anaesthetic technique. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures were recorded and the changes from baseline to those values during and after scopy were compared. The time interval from reversal to extubation and the sedation score at the end of the surgery were also noted. The statistical analysis of the data was done using student’s T-test. Results : The mean of the differences in heart rate from baseline value to scopy at 5 minutes was 13.6 ± 11.26 for clonidine and 12.05 ± 9.42 for metoprolol P=0.64 and that of mean blood pressure was 16.5 ± 8.75 and 13.45±9.69 P=0.30. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the attenuation of cardiovascular response. The sedation produced by clonidine was comparable with that of diazepam. Conclusion: Both clonidine and metoprolol were equally effective in attenuating the hemodynamic responses to the procedure.

Key concepts: Clonidine, Metoprolol, Medicine, Premedication, Sedation, Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hemodynamic Responses to Microlaryngoscopy in ENT Patients -A Comparative Study of Premedication with Oral Clonidine and Metoprolol — Research Paper | ScholarLens