1997Journal of GeosciencesRequires access

Unusual REE distribution patterns in fluorites from Sn-W deposits of the quartz-cassiterite and quartz-wolframite type

V. V. Gavrilenko, М. В. Морозов, U. Kempe, V Smolenskiy, D. Wolf

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

Fluorite is well known as an excellent tracer for REE fractionation in ore-forming processes (Balashov, 1976; Bau & Dulski, 1992). We present REE data for fluorite from three granite-related Sn–W deposits of the quartz– cassiterite and quartz–wolframite type, located in different regions of Eurasia: Ehrenfriedersdorf (Erzgebirge), Urmi (Russian Far East) and Aqshatau (Central Kazakhstan). Fluorite is a common mineral in all stages of oreformation on these deposits. Normally, REE distribution patterns of fluorites are similar to those of the host granites for endocontact samples, i.e., they are characterized by enrichment in both LREE and HREE and a strong negative Eu anomaly. In exocontact, distinct positive Eu anomalies are observed together with some depletion in HREE (Goldstein et al., 1995; see also Fig. 1, left). In contrast, an unusual REE distribution is found for a rare pale rose or pale blue fluorite in mineral associations relatively uncommon for deposits of the quartz–cassiterite and quartz–wolframite type (Fig. 1, right). Pale rose fluorite occurs in early tourmaline veins with beryl and cassiterite from the Ehrenfriedersdorf deposit (1). The pale rose fluorite in massive quartz–topaz–cassiterite metasomatites from Urmi forms similar intergrowth with tourmaline needles as in Ehrenfriedersdorf (2). In Aqshatau, pale rose fluorite in wolframite-bearing quartz–mica greisen with sericite (3) and pale blue fluorite from quartz-topaz bodies with beryl (4) yield the same REE characteristics as the samples from Ehrenfriedersdorf and Urmi: enrichment in HREE and strong depletion in LREE, occasionally with a weak positive Eu anomaly. Such REE behaviour cannot be explained by the influence of wall rocks (granites, schists, gneisses, etc.), or fractionation between different minerals and fluids within veins or metasomatites. We assume that these REE distribution patterns represent the primary REE characteristics of the fluids.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fluorite is well known as an excellent tracer for REE fractionation in ore-forming processes (Balashov, 1976; Bau & Dulski, 1992). We present REE data for fluorite from three granite-related Sn–W deposits of the quartz– cassiterite and quartz–wolframite type, located in different regions of Eurasia: Ehrenfriedersdorf (Erzgebirge), Urmi (Russian Far East) and Aqshatau (Central Kazakhstan). Fluorite is a common mineral in all stages of oreformation on these deposits. Normally, REE distribution patterns of fluorites are similar to those of the host granites for endocontact samples, i.e., they are characterized by enrichment in both LREE and HREE and a strong negative Eu anomaly. In exocontact, distinct positive Eu anomalies are observed together with some depletion in HREE (Goldstein et al., 1995; see also Fig. 1, left). In contrast, an unusual REE distribution is found for a rare pale rose or pale blue fluorite in mineral associations relatively uncommon for deposits of the quartz–cassiterite and quartz–wolframite type (Fig. 1, right). Pale rose fluorite occurs in early tourmaline veins with beryl and cassiterite from the Ehrenfriedersdorf deposit (1). The pale rose fluorite in massive quartz–topaz–cassiterite metasomatites from Urmi forms similar intergrowth with tourmaline needles as in Ehrenfriedersdorf (2). In Aqshatau, pale rose fluorite in wolframite-bearing quartz–mica greisen with sericite (3) and pale blue fluorite from quartz-topaz bodies with beryl (4) yield the same REE characteristics as the samples from Ehrenfriedersdorf and Urmi: enrichment in HREE and strong depletion in LREE, occasionally with a weak positive Eu anomaly. Such REE behaviour cannot be explained by the influence of wall rocks (granites, schists, gneisses, etc.), or fractionation between different minerals and fluids within veins or metasomatites. We assume that these REE distribution patterns represent the primary REE characteristics of the fluids.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fluorite is well known as an excellent tracer for REE fractionation in ore-forming processes (Balashov, 1976; Bau & Dulski, 1992). We present REE data for fluorite from three granite-related Sn–W deposits of the quartz– cassiterite and quartz–wolframite type, located in different regions of Eurasia: Ehrenfriedersdorf (Erzgebirge), Urmi (Russian Far East) and Aqshatau (Central Kazakhstan). Fluorite is a common mineral in all stages of oreformation on these deposits. Normally, REE distribution patterns of fluorites are similar to those of the host granites for endocontact samples, i.e., they are characterized by enrichment in both LREE and HREE and a strong negative Eu anomaly. In exocontact, distinct positive Eu anomalies are observed together with some depletion in HREE (Goldstein et al., 1995; see also Fig. 1, left). In contrast, an unusual REE distribution is found for a rare pale rose or pale blue fluorite in mineral associations relatively uncommon for deposits of the quartz–cassiterite and quartz–wolframite type (Fig. 1, right). Pale rose fluorite occurs in early tourmaline veins with beryl and cassiterite from the Ehrenfriedersdorf deposit (1). The pale rose fluorite in massive quartz–topaz–cassiterite metasomatites from Urmi forms similar intergrowth with tourmaline needles as in Ehrenfriedersdorf (2). In Aqshatau, pale rose fluorite in wolframite-bearing quartz–mica greisen with sericite (3) and pale blue fluorite from quartz-topaz bodies with beryl (4) yield the same REE characteristics as the samples from Ehrenfriedersdorf and Urmi: enrichment in HREE and strong depletion in LREE, occasionally with a weak positive Eu anomaly. Such REE behaviour cannot be explained by the influence of wall rocks (granites, schists, gneisses, etc.), or fractionation between different minerals and fluids within veins or metasomatites. We assume that these REE distribution patterns represent the primary REE characteristics of the fluids.

Key concepts: Cassiterite, Wolframite, Fluorite, Greisen, Geology, Tourmaline, Topaz, Quartz

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Unusual REE distribution patterns in fluorites from Sn-W deposits of the quartz-cassiterite and quartz-wolframite type — Research Paper | ScholarLens