Antitrust Battles in North Carolina Have Significant Implications for State Medical Boards
Eric M. Fish
Abstract
Eric M. Fish
Abstract
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld a Federal Trade Commission ruling that the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners engaged in anticompetitive when it prevented non-dentists from providing teeth whitening services to consumers. This article explores the Board's contention that its actions were protected by the state action doctrine and the impact of the decision on state medical boards.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit upheld a Federal Trade Commission ruling that the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners engaged in anticompetitive when it prevented non-dentists from providing teeth whitening services to consumers. This article explores the Board's contention that its actions were protected by the state action doctrine and the impact of the decision on state medical boards.
Key concepts: Commission, State (computer science), Doctrine, Law, Court decision, Political science, Federal court, Business