1999ThinkTech (Texas Tech University)Open access

Anti-Trust Law: A Long Time Coming—United States Supreme Court Adopts the "Rule of Reason" Test for Vertical Maximum Price Fixing Cases in State Oil Co. v. Khan

Jarod S. Gonzalez

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This note will examine the reasons for the change from a per se test to a rule of reason analysis in vertical maximum price fixing cases. First, this note will point out that the per se rule in vertical maximum price fixing cases was a product of historical precedent, rather than detailed economic analysis. Second, this note will demonstrate why the Albrecht decision violated the purposes of the Sherman Act. Third, the note will explain why Khan appropriately changed the law in this area. Finally, in light of the recent passage of the Oklahoma Antitrust Statute, the note will evaluate the impact of the rule of reason test in vertical maximum price fixing cases in Oklahoma.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This note will examine the reasons for the change from a per se test to a rule of reason analysis in vertical maximum price fixing cases. First, this note will point out that the per se rule in vertical maximum price fixing cases was a product of historical precedent, rather than detailed economic analysis. Second, this note will demonstrate why the Albrecht decision violated the purposes of the Sherman Act. Third, the note will explain why Khan appropriately changed the law in this area. Finally, in light of the recent passage of the Oklahoma Antitrust Statute, the note will evaluate the impact of the rule of reason test in vertical maximum price fixing cases in Oklahoma.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This note will examine the reasons for the change from a per se test to a rule of reason analysis in vertical maximum price fixing cases. First, this note will point out that the per se rule in vertical maximum price fixing cases was a product of historical precedent, rather than detailed economic analysis. Second, this note will demonstrate why the Albrecht decision violated the purposes of the Sherman Act. Third, the note will explain why Khan appropriately changed the law in this area. Finally, in light of the recent passage of the Oklahoma Antitrust Statute, the note will evaluate the impact of the rule of reason test in vertical maximum price fixing cases in Oklahoma.

Key concepts: Law, Supreme court, State (computer science), Test (biology), Political science, Economics, Law and economics, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anti-Trust Law: A Long Time Coming—United States Supreme Court Adopts the "Rule of Reason" Test for Vertical Maximum Price Fixing Cases in State Oil Co. v. Khan — Research Paper | ScholarLens