ScholarLens Back to search
2006•SMU Scholar (Southern Methodist University)Open access

Presumed Guilty: Balancing Competing Rights and Interests in Combating Economic Crimes

Ndiva Kofele-Kale

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

NDIVA KOFELE-KALE* "It is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

NDIVA KOFELE-KALE* "It is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

NDIVA KOFELE-KALE* "It is better that ten guilty persons escape, than that one innocent suffer.

Key concepts: Presumption of innocence, Derogation, Presumption, Political science, Law, Law and economics, Human rights, Context (archaeology)

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Presumed Guilty: Balancing Competing Rights and Interests in Combating Economic Crimes — Research Paper | ScholarLens