2016OtolaryngologyRequires access

A Charge Comparison of Audiometric Testing in the Pediatric Population

Samuel J. Trosman, Katie R. Geelan‐Hansen, Samantha Anne

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the charges associated with performing combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions vs a comprehensive audiogram in the pediatric population and to analyze its implications for future practice. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective charge analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care academic center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Analysis was performed on 538 pediatric patients who underwent audiometric hearing testing from May through October 2014. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients had combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions testing and 91 patients underwent a comprehensive audiogram, while 46 patients underwent all 3 tests. The technical and professional charges for combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions were $139 and $116, respectively, with an overall charge of $255. The technical and professional charges for an audiogram were $124 and $198, respectively, with an overall charge of $322. CONCLUSION: Objective testing with a combination of tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions charges insurers $67 less than an audiogram. Given the questionable reliability of behavioral audiometry in very young children, this is a factor to consider when choosing the appropriate test. With a large number of pediatric auditory hearing tests performed each year, the cost savings within the health care system could be substantial.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To determine the charges associated with performing combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions vs a comprehensive audiogram in the pediatric population and to analyze its implications for future practice. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective charge analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care academic center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Analysis was performed on 538 pediatric patients who underwent audiometric hearing testing from May through October 2014. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients had combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions testing and 91 patients underwent a comprehensive audiogram, while 46 patients underwent all 3 tests. The technical and professional charges for combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions were $139 and $116, respectively, with an overall charge of $255. The technical and professional charges for an audiogram were $124 and $198, respectively, with an overall charge of $322. CONCLUSION: Objective testing with a combination of tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions charges insurers $67 less than an audiogram. Given the questionable reliability of behavioral audiometry in very young children, this is a factor to consider when choosing the appropriate test. With a large number of pediatric auditory hearing tests performed each year, the cost savings within the health care system could be substantial.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the charges associated with performing combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions vs a comprehensive audiogram in the pediatric population and to analyze its implications for future practice. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective charge analysis. SETTING: Tertiary care academic center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Analysis was performed on 538 pediatric patients who underwent audiometric hearing testing from May through October 2014. RESULTS: In total, 401 patients had combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions testing and 91 patients underwent a comprehensive audiogram, while 46 patients underwent all 3 tests. The technical and professional charges for combined tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions were $139 and $116, respectively, with an overall charge of $255. The technical and professional charges for an audiogram were $124 and $198, respectively, with an overall charge of $322. CONCLUSION: Objective testing with a combination of tympanometry and otoacoustic emissions charges insurers $67 less than an audiogram. Given the questionable reliability of behavioral audiometry in very young children, this is a factor to consider when choosing the appropriate test. With a large number of pediatric auditory hearing tests performed each year, the cost savings within the health care system could be substantial.

Key concepts: Tympanometry, Audiogram, Audiometry, Audiology, Medicine, Population, Otoacoustic emission, Hearing loss

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Charge Comparison of Audiometric Testing in the Pediatric Population — Research Paper | ScholarLens