2014•臺灣整形外科醫學會雜誌Requires access

C-Arm Guided Reduction of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures

Jenq-Liang Kung, Yu‐Hsiu Yen, Kao Yu Chuan, Chi‐Ming Pu, Chih-Ho Liu, Jinqing Wu, Shiuh-Yen Lu, Ming-Ting Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Background: The accurate surgical reduction of fractures is optimally performed by visualizing fracture displacement; however, the reduction of zygomatic arch fractures is typically accomplished using closed reduction. Anatomic reduction can be assured using only postoperative radiographs, thus causing intraoperative uncertainty. Aims and Objectives: This article introduces intraoperative C-arm guided reduction for assessing zygomatic arch fractures to assure the anatomic reduction of fracture displacement. Materials and Methods: Our hospital treated 261 patients for zygomatic bone fractures from 2002 to 2012; 32 of the patients exhibited isolated zygomatic arch fractures. Unstable fractures that exhibited severe comminution or torn periostea requiring internal or external fixation were excluded. Before operation, associated injuries, such as head and C-spine injuries, were meticulously evaluated and excluded. To prevent inadequate reduction of arch fracture displacement, Gillies reduction was performed using a C-arm guide and spare-hand palpation. Postoperative zygomatic bone X-rays were assessed to confirm the results of using the C-arm. Results: Most of the zygomatic arch fracture displacements attained anatomic reduction; however, approximately 10% of the arch fractures attained no anatomical reduction. Only one case demonstrated no obvious reduction after the operation, which was performed 2 weeks after injury. Conclusion: The intraoperative C-arm guided reduction of zygomatic arch fractures can assure the anatomic reduction of arch fracture displacements.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: The accurate surgical reduction of fractures is optimally performed by visualizing fracture displacement; however, the reduction of zygomatic arch fractures is typically accomplished using closed reduction. Anatomic reduction can be assured using only postoperative radiographs, thus causing intraoperative uncertainty. Aims and Objectives: This article introduces intraoperative C-arm guided reduction for assessing zygomatic arch fractures to assure the anatomic reduction of fracture displacement. Materials and Methods: Our hospital treated 261 patients for zygomatic bone fractures from 2002 to 2012; 32 of the patients exhibited isolated zygomatic arch fractures. Unstable fractures that exhibited severe comminution or torn periostea requiring internal or external fixation were excluded. Before operation, associated injuries, such as head and C-spine injuries, were meticulously evaluated and excluded. To prevent inadequate reduction of arch fracture displacement, Gillies reduction was performed using a C-arm guide and spare-hand palpation. Postoperative zygomatic bone X-rays were assessed to confirm the results of using the C-arm. Results: Most of the zygomatic arch fracture displacements attained anatomic reduction; however, approximately 10% of the arch fractures attained no anatomical reduction. Only one case demonstrated no obvious reduction after the operation, which was performed 2 weeks after injury. Conclusion: The intraoperative C-arm guided reduction of zygomatic arch fractures can assure the anatomic reduction of arch fracture displacements.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: The accurate surgical reduction of fractures is optimally performed by visualizing fracture displacement; however, the reduction of zygomatic arch fractures is typically accomplished using closed reduction. Anatomic reduction can be assured using only postoperative radiographs, thus causing intraoperative uncertainty. Aims and Objectives: This article introduces intraoperative C-arm guided reduction for assessing zygomatic arch fractures to assure the anatomic reduction of fracture displacement. Materials and Methods: Our hospital treated 261 patients for zygomatic bone fractures from 2002 to 2012; 32 of the patients exhibited isolated zygomatic arch fractures. Unstable fractures that exhibited severe comminution or torn periostea requiring internal or external fixation were excluded. Before operation, associated injuries, such as head and C-spine injuries, were meticulously evaluated and excluded. To prevent inadequate reduction of arch fracture displacement, Gillies reduction was performed using a C-arm guide and spare-hand palpation. Postoperative zygomatic bone X-rays were assessed to confirm the results of using the C-arm. Results: Most of the zygomatic arch fracture displacements attained anatomic reduction; however, approximately 10% of the arch fractures attained no anatomical reduction. Only one case demonstrated no obvious reduction after the operation, which was performed 2 weeks after injury. Conclusion: The intraoperative C-arm guided reduction of zygomatic arch fractures can assure the anatomic reduction of arch fracture displacements.

Key concepts: Zygomatic arch, Reduction (mathematics), Medicine, Zygomatic Fractures, Arch, Displacement (psychology), Surgery, Geometry

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
C-Arm Guided Reduction of Isolated Zygomatic Arch Fractures — Research Paper | ScholarLens