2016•Australian Journal of Primary HealthRequires access

Commissioning in New Zealand: learning from the past and present

Jacqueline Cumming

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Over the past 25 years, New Zealand has had significant experience with two very different approaches to commissioning health and disability support services. The first is the purchaser-provider split model adopted during the 1990s. The second is the approach that replaced it in 2001, the District Health Board model, which is still in place today. Although the New Zealand health system has several desirable characteristics and recent developments in commissioning arrangements are improvements on earlier approaches, the system is slow at reorienting care, particularly towards primary healthcare services. Alternative arrangements have strengths and weaknesses but the current 'alliancing' approach in New Zealand needs time to consolidate and demonstrate whether it can deliver before those alternatives are seriously considered.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the past 25 years, New Zealand has had significant experience with two very different approaches to commissioning health and disability support services. The first is the purchaser-provider split model adopted during the 1990s. The second is the approach that replaced it in 2001, the District Health Board model, which is still in place today. Although the New Zealand health system has several desirable characteristics and recent developments in commissioning arrangements are improvements on earlier approaches, the system is slow at reorienting care, particularly towards primary healthcare services. Alternative arrangements have strengths and weaknesses but the current 'alliancing' approach in New Zealand needs time to consolidate and demonstrate whether it can deliver before those alternatives are seriously considered.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the past 25 years, New Zealand has had significant experience with two very different approaches to commissioning health and disability support services. The first is the purchaser-provider split model adopted during the 1990s. The second is the approach that replaced it in 2001, the District Health Board model, which is still in place today. Although the New Zealand health system has several desirable characteristics and recent developments in commissioning arrangements are improvements on earlier approaches, the system is slow at reorienting care, particularly towards primary healthcare services. Alternative arrangements have strengths and weaknesses but the current 'alliancing' approach in New Zealand needs time to consolidate and demonstrate whether it can deliver before those alternatives are seriously considered.

Key concepts: Project commissioning, Population health, Government (linguistics), Health economics, Publishing, Health care, Community health, Strengths and weaknesses

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Commissioning in New Zealand: learning from the past and present — Research Paper | ScholarLens