2015Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of the use of 80 km/h advisory speed signs on unsealed roads in South Australia

C N Kloeden

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A number of 80 km/h advisory speed signs were placed on unsealed roads in the Yankalilla area in South Australia in November 2014. As part of the evaluation of this trial, two weeks of vehicle speed measurement data was collected at 12 sites on these roads in June 2014 and again in January 2015. While the legal speed limit for these roads was 100 km/h, typical vehicle speeds at the measurement sites were well below this limit with typical mean speeds being around 60 km/h and only around 10 per cent of vehicles exceeding 80 km/h and less than 1% exceeding 100 km/h. Based on this, it is clear that a 100km/h travel speed is not suitable for these roads and that an 80 km/h maximum advisory speed sign is not out of place. A reduction in vehicle speeds (using various measures) was found after the advisory speed signs were installed. However, the interpretation of this reduction is complicated by the seven month gap between the two surveys. There were significant changes in the road surface conditions between the surveys on some roads and in fact the roads with improved surfaces also tended to exhibit higher speeds. When roads with obviously changed surface conditions were taken out, the reduction in vehicle speeds was considerably greater. However, it is not possible to disentangle the seasonal effects from the effect of the advisory speed signs using the current data. Another survey conducted at the same locations in June 2015 would be useful as it would remove the seasonal effect from the comparison.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A number of 80 km/h advisory speed signs were placed on unsealed roads in the Yankalilla area in South Australia in November 2014. As part of the evaluation of this trial, two weeks of vehicle speed measurement data was collected at 12 sites on these roads in June 2014 and again in January 2015. While the legal speed limit for these roads was 100 km/h, typical vehicle speeds at the measurement sites were well below this limit with typical mean speeds being around 60 km/h and only around 10 per cent of vehicles exceeding 80 km/h and less than 1% exceeding 100 km/h. Based on this, it is clear that a 100km/h travel speed is not suitable for these roads and that an 80 km/h maximum advisory speed sign is not out of place. A reduction in vehicle speeds (using various measures) was found after the advisory speed signs were installed. However, the interpretation of this reduction is complicated by the seven month gap between the two surveys. There were significant changes in the road surface conditions between the surveys on some roads and in fact the roads with improved surfaces also tended to exhibit higher speeds. When roads with obviously changed surface conditions were taken out, the reduction in vehicle speeds was considerably greater. However, it is not possible to disentangle the seasonal effects from the effect of the advisory speed signs using the current data. Another survey conducted at the same locations in June 2015 would be useful as it would remove the seasonal effect from the comparison.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A number of 80 km/h advisory speed signs were placed on unsealed roads in the Yankalilla area in South Australia in November 2014. As part of the evaluation of this trial, two weeks of vehicle speed measurement data was collected at 12 sites on these roads in June 2014 and again in January 2015. While the legal speed limit for these roads was 100 km/h, typical vehicle speeds at the measurement sites were well below this limit with typical mean speeds being around 60 km/h and only around 10 per cent of vehicles exceeding 80 km/h and less than 1% exceeding 100 km/h. Based on this, it is clear that a 100km/h travel speed is not suitable for these roads and that an 80 km/h maximum advisory speed sign is not out of place. A reduction in vehicle speeds (using various measures) was found after the advisory speed signs were installed. However, the interpretation of this reduction is complicated by the seven month gap between the two surveys. There were significant changes in the road surface conditions between the surveys on some roads and in fact the roads with improved surfaces also tended to exhibit higher speeds. When roads with obviously changed surface conditions were taken out, the reduction in vehicle speeds was considerably greater. However, it is not possible to disentangle the seasonal effects from the effect of the advisory speed signs using the current data. Another survey conducted at the same locations in June 2015 would be useful as it would remove the seasonal effect from the comparison.

Key concepts: Speed limit, Environmental science, Traffic speed, Meteorology, Sign (mathematics), Current (fluid), Geography, Transport engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the use of 80 km/h advisory speed signs on unsealed roads in South Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens